Malaysia is implementing a National Digital Identity (NDI)
system to provide secure and convenient access to online
government and private services, reducing identity theft risks,
improving service efficiency, and promoting economic growth. To
realise the full potential of the NDI, it is important to
understand the perspectives of service providers, such as their
awareness, perception, acceptance, and adoption of the
initiatives. This research intends to identify the factors
influencing service providers’ awareness and readiness to adopt
Malaysia’s NDI system. It aims to measure the level of NDI
awareness among service providers, identify the factors that
promote or hinder its adoption, assess the readiness to use NDI
and provide recommendations to promote its adoption among
specified service providers’ categories. This research employs
the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to understand factors
influencing the acceptance and use of Malaysia’s NDI system,
which has two (2) constructs: perceived usefulness and perceived
ease of use. A mixed-methods approach was used with a survey
questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire
measured awareness, perception, acceptance, and adoption of the
NDI initiatives, and the interviews explored service providers’
perspectives on the initiatives. The sample size was 122
respondents, and the findings were analysed using frequency
distributions and descriptive and inferential statistics. The
most important factors are public awareness, privacy and data
protection, proper enforcement, digital identity protection, IT
infrastructure, and government transparency. An
independent-sample t-test and a chi-square test of independence
were conducted to evaluate the relationship between perception
and acceptance of NDI and different socio-demographics. Only
age, gender, and sector showed significant relationships with
the perception of NDI, while all demographics were insignificant
predictors of acceptance of NDI. The results suggest that more
targeted interventions are needed to promote NDI literacy, and
addressing the factors contributing to NDI literacy is essential
to creating a more informed and inclusive society.
Keywords: National Digital Identity, Awareness, Perception,
Acceptance, Adoption
02 introduction
In recent years, the Malaysian government has been actively
working towards the development and implementation of an NDI
system. The primary objective of this system is to provide
citizens with a secure and convenient way of accessing
government and private sector services online. By streamlining
and enhancing the digital identity verification process, the NDI
system aims to bring numerous benefits, including reducing the
risks of identity theft, improving service delivery efficiency,
and fostering economic growth through the promotion of
e-commerce and digital transactions. However, the success of the
NDI system hinges on the willingness of service providers to
adopt and integrate it into their operations. Thus, it becomes
imperative to investigate the awareness, perception, acceptance,
and adoption of the NDI system from the perspective of these
service providers.
The COVID-19 pandemic has
significantly accelerated the scale and importance of digital
interactions and services. For service providers, whether they
offer products, services, or data, it has become more crucial
than ever to ensure that the customer or partner at the other
end of the interaction is genuine. This assurance is essential
not only for digital interactions but also for physical
interactions that require verification of credentials, such as
proving health status for international travel or age
verification for purchasing restricted goods. As our physical
and digital lives become increasingly intertwined, the need to
identify and verify ourselves and the entities we interact with
becomes paramount. This is where the concept of digital identity
comes into play. Regardless of whether interactions occur in the
physical or digital realm, digital identity provides a means for
all parties involved in an exchange to prove their
authenticity.
While various studies have explored the
factors influencing the adoption of digital identity systems
from the users’ perspective, limited attention has been given to
understanding the viewpoint of service providers. Therefore,
comprehending the perspectives, views, and attitudes of service
providers towards the NDI system is crucial in identifying
potential barriers and enablers of adoption. Such insights will
help in developing effective strategies to facilitate the
successful implementation of the NDI system.
03 problem statement
The Malaysian government is developing an NDI system to support
the growth of the digital economy across various service
provider sectors. NDI aims to provide citizens with a secure and
convenient way of accessing government and private sector
services online. However, the success of the NDI system relies
on service providers’ willingness to adopt and integrate it into
their operations.
However, despite the importance of
service providers’ adoption and integration of the NDI system,
there is a lack of focus on service provider-centeredness in NDI
development, with a predominant focus on technical aspects,
security, and privacy issues. This lack of attention may result
in infrastructure and standardisation barriers that hinder
service providers from adopting the NDI system. Service
providers play a crucial role in successfully adopting the NDI
system, as they are responsible for integrating the system into
their operations and providing services to citizens.
There
is a need to understand the awareness, perception, acceptance,
and adoption of Malaysia’s NDI initiatives from the service
providers’ perspective to address these issues. The Public
Consultation Report (PCR) on the NDI Framework for Malaysia,
published in August 2020, provided a foundation for
investigating service providers’ attitudes toward the NDI
system. In addition to gathering user feedback, the PCR’s
questions about service providers and the advantages of NDI
could serve as the foundation for a more thorough investigation
into the specifics and problems surrounding service provider
awareness, perception, and acceptance of Malaysia’s NDI
initiative.
Therefore, the barriers and enablers of
service providers’ awareness, perception, acceptance, and
adoption of Malaysia’s NDI initiatives should be investigated so
that policymakers and stakeholders can address these factors to
promote the successful adoption and integration of the NDI
system into service providers’ operations.
04 research objectives
This research aims to clarify the factors contributing to
heightened awareness and readiness by service providers to adopt
and use the NDI as part of Malaysia’s digital aspirations. The
specific objectives include:
To gauge the level of NDI awareness and understanding
amongst service providers;
To identify the factors promoting and hindering the adoption
of NDI amongst service providers;
To determine the level of readiness to take up and use NDI
amongst service providers; and
Provide recommendations to promote awareness and adoption
amongst specified service providers’ categories.
05 literature review
Digital identification systems have the potential to simplify
citizens’ access to government services, including social
welfare programmes and healthcare services, by reducing the
reliance on paper-based documentation and streamlining the
registration and verification procedures. This can lead to
improved efficiency in service delivery and enhanced convenience
for individuals seeking necessary services.
Furthermore, digital identification systems can alleviate
government agencies’ administrative burdens through automated
registration and verification processes, real-time data
validation, improved data sharing, and efficient monitoring and
tracking systems.
By serving as a unique identifier, digital identification
systems can establish connections with diverse service delivery
programmes, such as banking, taxation and land registration.
This integration augments service efficiency by enabling
citizens to access multiple services using a single digital ID,
eliminating the requirement for multiple identification
documents. Consequently, it facilitates enhanced access to
government services and benefits, fostering inclusivity and
efficiency within society.
Numerous countries worldwide are in the process of implementing
or have already implemented NDI systems. Examples include
Aadhaar in India, e-Identity in Estonia, SingPass in Singapore,
Väestörekisterikeskus in Finland, Canada Digital Identity
Program in Canada, eDNI in Spain, and eIDAS in Germany.
Problems or issues with current digital identity system
NDI systems have the potential to enhance government services
and mitigate fraud and leakage in welfare programmes. However,
there are several important issues that require attention.
One
concern relates to privacy. The collection and storage of
biometric and personal information in a centralised database
raise apprehensions about potential misuse and the risk of data
breaches. Another issue revolves around inclusion and
accessibility. Certain populations, such as residents in rural
areas, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities, may face
challenges in easily accessing NDI systems, leading to potential
exclusion from government services and welfare programmes.
Dependence on NDI systems can also pose a problem.
Relying extensively on these systems for various services can
create dependency, making the situation problematic in case of
system failures or other issues. Cost is another factor to
consider. Implementing and maintaining NDI systems can be
expensive, and these costs may be transferred to citizens and
businesses in the form of fees or taxes. Furthermore, inadequate
infrastructure and resources in certain countries can hinder the
successful implementation of digital identity systems.
Potential for privacy violations and the need for strong
security measures to protect personal information
National digital identification systems are a major concern
because they have the potential for privacy violations and the
misuse of personal information. Personal information is stored
in a centralised database, and if not properly secured, it can
be accessed, used, or shared without the individual’s consent or
knowledge. Additionally, the collection, storage, and use of
personal identification information could enable governments or
other organisations to track individuals’ movements, activities,
and interactions, which could violate individual rights and
freedoms.
To address this concern, it is important
to have strict regulations and oversight mechanisms in place to
ensure that the collection, storage, and use of personal
identification information is done in accordance with the laws
and is used for legitimate purposes only. Additionally, it is
important to have a strict policy and technical measures for
data retention and destruction that limit the period of time the
data is kept and that it is permanently destroyed when no longer
needed. Finally, an independent oversight body should monitor
and investigate any potential misuse of personal identification
information and ensure that an individual’s rights and freedoms
are protected.
The need for interoperability between different systems and
legal and regulatory frameworks for national digital identity
systems
Several key technical considerations shape the effectiveness of
these systems, including identity verification, authentication,
identity proofing, identity management, interoperability, secure
communication, blockchain technology, and biometrics.
Identity
verification involves confirming that an individual’s claimed
identity aligns with their actual identity, while authentication
verifies a user’s claimed identity to grant access to a
particular service or resource. Identity proofing encompasses
the collection and verification of personal information to
establish an individual’s identity, and identity management
involves maintaining and updating an individual’s identification
details throughout the system’s lifespan. Interoperability
refers to the system’s ability to integrate and share
information with other systems and services, while secure
communication is vital for preventing unauthorised access and
data tampering. The utilisation of biometrics is increasingly
prominent in digital identification systems, offering a more
secure and convenient means for individuals to authenticate
their identity.
In addition to technical
considerations, a robust legal and regulatory framework is
imperative for NDI systems. Such frameworks ensure compliance
with laws, safeguard citizens’ rights and privacy, and maintain
system integrity. Key issues within this framework include data
protection and privacy laws, guidelines for the use and
management of personal identification information, transparency,
accountability, clearly defined roles and responsibilities,
access to justice, adherence to international standards, and
flexibility.
The importance of involving various stakeholders in the design,
development, and implementation of national digital
identification systems
Diverse stakeholders must participate during the design,
development, and implementation of NDI systems to ensure that
the system effectively meets the needs of all involved parties
and gains social and political acceptance. Engaging stakeholders
in the system’s design and development process fosters trust and
support among all parties, strengthens security and privacy
measures, tackles potential challenges and opportunities,
evaluates feasibility and impacts, and promotes ownership and
sustainability. Early involvement of stakeholders facilitates
the identification of the system’s effects on various groups and
enables the assessment of its viability. Engaging government
agencies, private sector entities (e.g., financial institutions,
telecommunication companies, and e-commerce providers), and
citizens in the design and development of the digital
identification system ensures that it caters to the needs of all
stakeholders and addresses their specific concerns.
Government agencies bear the responsibility for implementing and
managing the digital identification system, while private sector
entities contribute valuable insights to its design and
development. Citizens can actively participate through public
consultations, focus groups, or user testing, ensuring that the
system aligns with their requirements and addresses their
apprehensions.
By involving all relevant stakeholders in the design and
development process, the digital identification system can
effectively cater to the needs of all parties, address their
concerns, and enhance the likelihood of widespread adoption and
usage by all stakeholders.
06 methodology
This study utilised a mixed-methods research design,
incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data collection
methods. Survey questionnaires were employed to collect
quantitative data, while personal interviews were conducted to
gather qualitative data. The survey questionnaires were
distributed among service providers in various industries in
Malaysia, selected through purposive sampling. The closed-ended
questions in the survey were adapted from Aceron V. P. (2021)
and Muñoz-Rodríguez J. M et al (2020). A pilot test with 30
participants was conducted to ensure reliability. Personal
interviews were then conducted with a subset of survey
respondents, employing a semi-structured and open-ended
approach. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis (using
NVIVO) were employed to analyse the quantitative and qualitative
data, respectively. The mixed-methods approach was chosen to
enable a comprehensive investigation and enhance the validity
and reliability of the findings. The quantitative data provided
a broad understanding of the respondents’ attitudes, while the
qualitative data offered detailed and context-specific insights
into their experiences and perceptions. A survey questionnaire
with multiple-choice and Likert scale questions was used to
collect quantitative data on service providers’ awareness,
perception, acceptance, and adoption of Malaysia’s NDI
initiatives. A semi-structured interview guide with open-ended
questions was developed to gather qualitative data on service
providers’ perspectives, experiences, benefits, challenges, and
recommendations regarding the initiatives.
This
research utilised purposive sampling to select participants from
six (6) different categories of service providers in Malaysia:
E-health, E-government, telecommunication, finance institutions,
education, e-wallet, and e-commerce. The sampling approach
targeted individuals with relevant knowledge and experience in
the implementation of Malaysia’s NDI initiatives within their
respective sectors. Data collection involved the use of a
questionnaire and interviews to investigate the perceptions of
individuals across various sectors. The questionnaire,
administered online and in-person, comprised five sections,
including demographic information and independent variables. The
collected data was analysed using SPSS, employing frequency
distributions, descriptive statistics, and inferential
statistics such as chi-square tests and t-tests to identify
patterns and significant differences.
The study
acknowledged limitations, including a relatively small sample
size and potential biases in data collection. Nonetheless, the
research aimed to provide insights into sector-specific
perceptions and inform strategies to enhance services.
Furthermore, the research focused on evaluating four (4) crucial
aspects of NDI implementation, including the level of knowledge
and comprehension among service providers, factors influencing
their adoption, readiness to accept and use NDI, and
recommendations for raising awareness and adoption. The findings
aimed to identify areas for improvement in NDI implementation,
facilitating Malaysia’s digitisation efforts. The study has
collected 44 responses from diverse service provider sectors.
The questionnaire has been validated by experts, and reliability
testing using Cronbach’s alpha and Kuder-Richardson Formula 20
(KR-20) will be conducted on the received responses. The pilot
test results (Table 1) indicate that Cronbach’s alpha values for
sections B, C, and D are acceptable, as they are all above 0.7.
However, no reliability tests were conducted for the
socio-demographic section and open-question section E.
Table 1: Pilot Test Results
07 findings and analysis
The data collection phase of the study involved obtaining
respondents from six (6) sectors: e-commerce, e-wallet,
e-health, education, e-government services, financial
institutions, and telecommunication. A total of 122 service
providers participated, with the majority falling within the age
range of 21 to 40 years (see Figure 1(a)). There was a higher
representation of female respondents (59 per cent) compared to
males (41 per cent) (see Figure 1(b)). The largest number of
respondents came from the e-government sector (49 per cent),
followed by e-health (23 per cent), financial institutions (12
per cent), education and telecommunication (7 per cent), and
e-wallet and e-commerce (1 per cent each) (see Figure 1(c)). The
respondents held various positions within their organisations,
providing diverse perspectives on the NDI initiatives, primarily
coming from the federal government (see Figure 1(d)). The
majority of service providers were located in Negeri Sembilan
(57 per cent), Selangor (16 per cent) and Perak (13 per cent)
(see Figure 1(e)), and most of the respondents identified as
Malays (88 per cent) (see Figure 1(f)). Regarding education, 45
per cent of the respondents held a degree, while 30 per cent had
a diploma/STPM (see Figure 1(g)). When asked about their
awareness of NDI, 75 per cent of the respondents reported not
having heard about it before, indicating limited knowledge or
utilisation of NDI within the industry (see Figure 1(h)). These
findings provide insights into the demographic characteristics
and levels of awareness among service providers, informing the
interpretation of the study’s results.
The study
aimed to assess the level of NDI awareness and understanding
among service providers based on various socio-demographic
factors. The findings of the study were analysed using
chi-square tests of independence to determine the relationships
between NDI awareness and understanding and factors such as age,
gender, sector, employment, state, ethnicity, and education. The
results indicated that age had a significant relationship with
NDI awareness and understanding. Younger individuals were found
to be more familiar with NDI compared to older individuals,
suggesting the need for targeted interventions to improve NDI
literacy among different age groups. However, no significant
relationships were found between NDI awareness and understanding
and gender, sector, employment, state, ethnicity, or education.
This suggests that individuals from different demographic
backgrounds may have similar levels of NDI awareness and
understanding. These findings highlight the importance of
considering factors beyond demographics in promoting NDI
literacy and developing inclusive strategies. It is worth noting
that the lack of significant relationships may be influenced by
factors such as measurement limitations, sampling bias, or
unaccounted confounding variables. Therefore, while the findings
provide valuable insights, they may not be generalised to all
populations or contexts. Overall, the study emphasises the need
for targeted interventions and comprehensive approaches to
promote NDI literacy, considering various factors that
contribute to individuals’ awareness and understanding of NDI.
By addressing these factors, policymakers and organisations can
work towards creating a more informed and inclusive society
regarding NDI.
(a) Respondent’s age category
(b) Respondent’s gender category
(c) Service provider's working sector category
(d) Service provider's working division category
(e) State of service provider
(f) Respondent's race
(g) Respondent's education level
(h) Respondents hearing about NDI before
Figure 1: Socio-demographic of The Respondents
Figure 2 presents the percentage distribution of various factors
in promoting the adoption of NDI. The highest percentage, at 19
per cent, is attributed to providing public awareness through
information dissemination, seminars, and training. This
emphasises the importance of educating the public about NDI to
build trust and understanding. The next significant factors are
secure privacy and data protection, each accounting for 14 per
cent. Ensuring proper privacy measures and data protection is
crucial to prevent unauthorised access and maintain trust in the
NDI system. Proper enforcement of NDI implementation and
enhanced digital identity protection share a percentage of 12
per cent each. These factors emphasise the need to enforce
compliance, enhance security measures, and protect sensitive
digital identity data to mitigate risks and promote trust.
Availability of effective IT infrastructure and government
transparency both represent nine (9) per cent. These factors
play a vital role in ensuring smooth implementation, promoting
trust, and preventing a digital divide. Ensuring accessibility,
acquiring technical skills seeking best practices, and improving
service features are at seven (7) per cent each. These factors
address the need for inclusivity, knowledge, and continuous
improvement to maximise the benefits of NDI. Concerns for good
governance received the lowest percentage, at four (4) per cent.
Good governance is essential to ensure fair, transparent, and
equitable implementation of NDI policies and regulations.
Overall, the figure highlights the importance of public
awareness, privacy, enforcement, IT infrastructure,
transparency, accessibility, technical skills, service
improvement, and good governance in promoting the successful
adoption of NDI.
Figure 2: Factors promoting the adoption of NDI
The study conducted an assessment of service providers’
readiness to adopt and utilise NDI while also examining the
perception and acceptance of NDI based on various demographic
factors. The findings revealed significant differences in
perception based on gender and sector. In terms of gender
differences, the study found that male participants demonstrated
a higher perception of NDI compared to females. This gender
disparity could potentially be attributed to prior experience
and familiarity with digital technologies. It is possible that
males have had more exposure to various digital tools, leading
to a greater comfort level and understanding of NDI.
Additionally, variations in the types of NDI applications used
by males and females might contribute to this disparity, with
males utilising NDI more frequently for tasks they perceive as
important or relevant. However, it is important to note that
these observations are preliminary and require further
investigation to fully understand the underlying factors
influencing the gender difference in NDI perception. In terms of
the sector, the e-government sector demonstrated a higher
perception of NDI compared to other sectors. This distinction
can be attributed to the e-government sector’s greater
experience and resources in implementing and promoting NDI. The
e-government sector may have invested more in training and
education on NDI, leading to enhanced levels of perception and
understanding among its employees. Furthermore, the routine and
frequent usage of NDI within the e-government sector may have
fostered greater familiarity and comfort with the technology. On
the other hand, other sectors may have limited exposure or
experience with NDI, resulting in lower levels of perception and
understanding. Disparities in training and education on NDI
provided by each sector could contribute to these differing
levels of perception. Overall, the study’s findings highlight
the importance of considering demographic factors such as gender
and sector when promoting the adoption and utilisation of NDI.
By recognising these differences in perception, policymakers and
organisations can tailor their awareness campaigns, training
programmes, and implementation strategies to address the
specific needs and concerns of different demographic groups.
Further research is needed to delve deeper into the underlying
factors influencing these differences and to develop targeted
interventions that can bridge the perception gap and promote
widespread acceptance and adoption of NDI across all demographic
groups and sectors.
On the other hand, age,
employment, state, ethnicity, and education did not
significantly influence the perception or acceptance of NDI.
This implies that individuals from diverse backgrounds,
regardless of their demographic characteristics, are equally
likely to accept NDI. This finding suggests a positive outlook
for the implementation and adoption of NDI, as it indicates its
potential for widespread acceptance across various demographics.
Factors such as the recognition of NDI’s importance and
benefits, its ease of use, and its convenience might outweigh
any demographic barriers. However, it is essential to continue
exploring and understanding additional factors that could impact
NDI acceptance, such as cultural aspects or personal values.
Furthermore, the study identified significant relationships
between acceptance of NDI and state as well as sector. This
suggests that location and organisational type influence the
acceptance level of NDI. Certain states or sectors may have
greater exposure to and familiarity with NDI, leading to higher
acceptance levels. This could be attributed to policies or
initiatives within specific states or sectors that promote NDI
usage and acceptance. For instance, states or sectors with
advanced digital literacy and infrastructure are more likely to
exhibit higher acceptance levels due to their ease of using
digital technologies. Similarly, states or sectors with a higher
level of trust in the government and its institutions may be
more receptive to NDI as a means of identification and
authentication. In conclusion, the research findings demonstrate
the varying levels of perception and acceptance of NDI based on
gender and sector, while factors such as age, employment, state,
ethnicity, and education did not significantly influence
perception or acceptance. The results highlight the potential
for widespread acceptance of NDI across diverse backgrounds and
provide insights into the influence of location and
organisational type on acceptance levels. Further research is
necessary to delve deeper into the underlying factors and
develop effective strategies for implementing and promoting NDI
adoption in a comprehensive and inclusive manner.
figure 3: Qualitative findings
(a) Five themes of being knowledge about NDI
A
(b) View on the implementation of NDI in the respective
sector
B
(c) Benefits of implementing NDI in certain aspects in the
sector
C
(d) Challenges of implementing NDI in certain aspects of your
sector
D
(e) Five themes of readiness to implement NDI in certain
aspects
E
Figure 3: Qualitative findings
The qualitative study aimed to provide recommendations for
promoting awareness and adoption of NDI among specific service
providers. Through interviews and analysis of responses, the
researchers addressed several research questions. The study
revealed that the level of knowledge about NDI among respondents
varied (see Figure 3(a)). Some actively sought information about
NDI, indicating a proactive approach to understanding the topic.
However, a significant number of respondents reported being
unaware or uninterested in NDI, highlighting a lack of
awareness. Some respondents had recently learned about NDI by
chance, while others had a partial understanding but desired
more comprehensive comprehension. Overall, the findings
indicated a mixed level of knowledge among respondents regarding
NDI. Regarding the implementation of NDI, respondents recognised
the potential benefits it could bring to various sectors (see
Figure 3(b)). These benefits included increased efficiency,
accuracy, decision-making, customer service, innovation, and
cost savings. However, implementing NDI also presented
challenges such as infrastructure shortcomings, lack of
awareness or knowledge among users and customers, understanding
by older individuals, and high implementation costs. To overcome
these challenges, organisations were advised to carefully assess
the cost-benefit of NDI implementation, invest in the necessary
infrastructure, provide training and support to users, raise
awareness among customers, and ensure robust cybersecurity
measures. The study also identified specific benefits of
implementing NDI in various aspects of sectors (see Figure
3(c)). These benefits included improved efficiency through
process automation, increased accuracy through automated data
collection and analysis, better decision-making through
real-time data and insights, enhanced customer service through
faster response times and personalised interactions, cost
savings through the elimination of manual processes, and
increased innovation through new ways of working and business
opportunities.
The study conducted a comprehensive
assessment of the challenges associated with the adoption and
utilisation of NDI and provided recommendations to overcome
these challenges (see Figure 3(d)). Several key challenges were
identified, including the need to upgrade existing systems,
integrate different technologies, and ensure cybersecurity.
Upgrading outdated systems was recognized as a significant
hurdle in implementing NDI. Many organisations have legacy
systems that may not be compatible with the new digital
infrastructure required for NDI. Upgrading these systems can be
time-consuming and expensive, but it is essential to ensure
smooth integration and functionality. Integrating diverse
technologies, such as cloud computing, data analytics, and IoT,
was also identified as a challenge. Implementing NDI often
requires the integration of various technological components,
and ensuring seamless compatibility and interoperability can be
complex. Organisations need to develop strategies to integrate
these technologies effectively and leverage their combined
capabilities. Cybersecurity was another critical challenge
highlighted by the study. Implementing NDI introduces new
cybersecurity risks, and organisations must prioritise data
protection and system security. Robust cybersecurity measures
need to be in place to safeguard against potential threats and
attacks, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of user
data. To address these challenges, the study recommended several
strategies. Raising awareness among stakeholders was emphasised
to ensure a comprehensive understanding of NDI and its benefits.
Organisations should provide training and resources to equip
employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to embrace NDI
effectively. Engaging with technology vendors and service
providers can also be beneficial in implementing NDI solutions.
They can offer guidance, support, and expertise in navigating
the complexities associated with NDI adoption. Additionally,
evaluating the cost-benefit analysis of implementing NDI is
crucial. Organisations need to assess the potential return on
investment and weigh the benefits against the associated costs.
This evaluation will help make informed decisions and prioritise
resources effectively. The readiness of sectors to implement NDI
varied among the respondents, depending on factors such as
digitization level, skilled workforce availability, technology
adoption, and the overall business environment (see Figure
3(e)). The study emphasised the need for continuous improvement
in NDI implementation across sectors. It recommended staying
updated on emerging technologies and opportunities to remain
competitive and enhance operations. In conclusion, the study
provided valuable insights into promoting awareness and adoption
of NDI among specific service providers. By following the
recommendations and addressing the challenges identified,
organisations can successfully implement NDI and leverage its
transformative potential in the digital era.
08 recommendation
Based on the findings of the research, where the literacy factor
emerged as a significant issue among Malaysians regarding the
NDI initiatives, we would like to propose the following
recommendations:
Public Awareness Campaigns
Develop comprehensive public awareness campaigns targeted at
different segments of the population, emphasising the importance
and benefits of the NDI initiatives. These campaigns should be
designed to be easily understandable and accessible, utilising
clear language, visuals, and examples to convey the key messages
effectively.
Educational Initiatives
Collaborate with educational institutions, both formal and
informal, to integrate digital literacy programmes into the
curriculum. This could include workshops, seminars, or online
modules aimed at improving digital skills, including
understanding and navigating the NDI ecosystem. By empowering
individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills, we can
bridge the literacy gap and enhance acceptance and adoption of
the NDI initiatives.
Simplify User Interfaces
Ensure that the user interfaces of NDI-related platforms and
applications are user-friendly, intuitive, and designed with the
needs of individuals with varying digital literacy levels in
mind. Incorporate visual cues, step-by-step guides, and
interactive elements to assist users in navigating and utilising
the NDI services effectively.
Multilingual Support
Recognise and address linguistic diversity in Malaysia by
providing multilingual support for NDI materials, websites, and
user interfaces. This will help individuals with limited
proficiency in the dominant language understand and engage with
the NDI initiatives more easily.
Partnerships with Community Organisations
Collaborate with community organisations, NGOs, and grassroots
initiatives to reach out to underserved communities and provide
targeted support and training on digital literacy and NDI
initiatives. These partnerships can facilitate localised efforts
and ensure that the benefits of the NDI are accessible to all
segments of society.
Continuous Evaluation and Feedback
Implement a system for continuous evaluation and feedback to
monitor the effectiveness of awareness and literacy programmes.
Regularly assess the impact of the initiatives and make
necessary adjustments based on user feedback and emerging
literacy needs.
By implementing these
recommendations, we can proactively address the literacy factor
as a major barrier to the adoption and acceptance of the NDI
initiatives in Malaysia. Through targeted awareness campaigns,
educational initiatives, simplified user interfaces,
multilingual support, community partnerships, and continuous
evaluation, we can enhance digital literacy levels and ensure a
more inclusive and successful implementation of the NDI
initiatives.
09 conclusion
In conclusion, the findings regarding the awareness, perception,
acceptance, and adoption of Malaysia’s NDI initiatives among
service providers based on different socio-demographics
highlight the significance of age as a determining factor.
Younger individuals exhibit higher levels of familiarity and
comprehension of NDI compared to older individuals, possibly due
to greater exposure or a higher inclination to seek information
about NDI. This suggests the need for targeted interventions to
improve NDI literacy across all age groups. On the other hand,
factors such as gender, sector, employment, state, ethnicity,
and education do not significantly predict NDI literacy,
indicating that these demographic variables alone do not
determine NDI awareness and understanding. However, this does
not negate the importance of addressing these factors in
promoting NDI literacy. Policymakers and organisations should
consider tailored approaches that go beyond demographic factors
to enhance NDI literacy and create an informed and inclusive
society.
The research also explored factors that
influence the adoption of NDI and emphasises the need to address
them effectively. Public awareness and education play a critical
role in promoting understanding, trust, proper usage, and wider
access to NDI. Privacy and data protection must be safeguarded
to prevent unauthorised access and maintain trust. Proper
implementation and enhanced digital identity protection are
essential to avoid non-compliance, fraud, and security risks.
Effective IT infrastructure, government transparency, and
accountability are crucial to minimise service disruptions,
scepticism, bias, and the digital divide. These findings
underscore the importance of comprehensive interventions that
encompass multiple factors beyond demographics to foster NDI
adoption and ensure a secure and inclusive digital identity
ecosystem.
10 references
Aceron V. P. (2021). An Evaluative Study on the citizen’s
perception towards the Philippine Identification System through
the lens of Technology Acceptance Model. Master Thesis.
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
Al-Khouri, A. M. (2012). PKI in government digital identity
management systems. European Journal of ePractice, 4(4).
Arner, D. W., Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Barberis,
J. N. (2019). The identity challenge in finance: from analogue
identity to digitized identification to digital KYC utilities.
European business organization law review, 20(1), 5580.
Berbecaru, D., Lioy, A., & Cameroni, C. (2019). Providing
digital identity and academic attributes through European eID
infrastructures: Results achieved, limitations, and future
steps. Software: Practice and Experience, 49(11), 1643-1662.
Boysen, A. (2021). Decentralized, self-sovereign, consortium:
The future of digital identity in Canada. Frontiers in
Blockchain, 11.
Cheng, L., Liu, F., & Yao, D. (2017). Enterprise data
breach: causes, challenges, prevention, and future directions.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge
Discovery, 7(5), e1211.
Clark, E. (2011). E-conveyancing in Australia: An important step
along the journey to E-government. JL Inf. & Sci., 21,
62.
de Andrade, N. N. G. (2012). Towards a European eID regulatory
framework: challenges in constructing a legal framework for the
protection and management of electronic identities (pp.
285-314). Springer Netherlands.
Fennelly, Orna, Caitriona Cunningham, Loretto Grogan, Heather
Cronin, Conor O’Shea, Miriam Roche, Fiona Lawlor, and Neil
O’Hare. “Successfully implementing a national electronic health
record: a rapid umbrella review.” International Journal of
Medical Informatics 144 (2020): 104281.
Fountain, J. E. (2004). Digital government and public health.
Preventing chronic disease, 1(4).
Gasser, U., Ienca, M., Scheibner, J., Sleigh, J., & Vayena,
E. (2020). Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical
challenges, and navigation aid. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(8),
e425-e434.
Giest, S., & Samuels, A. (2022). Administrative burden in
digital public service delivery: The social infrastructure of
library programs for e‐inclusion. Review of Policy Research.
Jøsang, A., Fabre, J., Hay, B., Dalziel, J., & Pope, S.
(2005, January). Trust requirements in identity management. In
Proceedings of the 2005 Australasian workshop on Grid computing
and e-research-Volume 44 (pp. 99-108).
Kim, M. C. (2004). Surveillance technology, privacy and social
control: With reference to the case of the electronic national
identification card in South Korea. International Sociology,
19(2), 193-213
Larson, D. L., Phillips-Mao, L., Quiram, G., Sharpe, L., Stark,
R., Sugita, S., & Weiler, A. (2011). A framework for
sustainable invasive species management: Environmental, social,
and economic objectives. Journal of environmental management,
92(1), 14-22.
Leung, D., Nolens, B., Arner, D., & Frost, J. (2022).
Corporate digital identity: no silver bullet, but a silver
lining. BIS Papers.
Lips, M. (2010). Rethinking citizen government relationships in
the age of digital identity: Insights from research. Information
Polity, 15(4), 273-289.
Macintosh, A. (2004, January). Characterizing e-participation in
policy-making. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (pp. 10-pp). IEEE.
Masiero, S., & Bailur, S. (2021). Digital identity for
development: The quest for justice and a research agenda.
Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 1-12.
McAlpine, M. (2005). E-portfolios and digital identity: Some
issues for discussion. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(4),
378-387.
Milberg, D. (2007). The National Identification Debate: Real ID
and Voter Identification. ISJLP, 3, 443.
Mir, U. B., Kar, A. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Gupta, M. P., &
Sharma, R. S. (2020). Realizing digital identity in government:
Prioritizing design and implementation objectives for Aadhaar in
India. Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 101442.
Mir, U., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2022). AI-enabled
digital identity inputs for stakeholders and policymakers.
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(3),
514-541.
Muñoz-Rodríguez J. M, Hernández Serrano M. J, Tabernero C.
(2020) Digital Identity Levels in Older Learners: A New Focus
for Sustainable Lifelong Education and Inclusion.
Sustainability,12(24), 10657.
Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., & Feltz, F. (2007).
Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of
identification and data sharing. Journal of management
information systems, 23(4), 29-51.
Páez, R., Pérez, M., Ramírez, G., Montes, J., & Bouvarel, L.
(2020). An architecture for biometric electronic identification
document system based on blockchain. Future Internet, 12(1),
10.
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2009). Digital identity
interoperability and einnovation. Berkman Publication Series.
Reveiu, A., Vințe, C., Lupu, V., & Dârdală, M. (2022).
LegitimID: A federative digital identity system for strong
authentication.
Rodrigues, R., Panagiotopoulos, A., Lundgren, B., Shaelou, S.
L., & Grant, A. (2019). Regulatory options for AI and big
data. SHERPA D3, 3.
Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting
digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society,
4(2), 2053951717736335.
Sedlmeir, J., Smethurst, R., Rieger, A., & Fridgen, G.
(2021). Digital identities and verifiable credentials. Business
& Information Systems Engineering, 63(5), 603-613.
Strauß, S., & Aichholzer, G. (2010). National electronic
identity management: the challenge of a citizen-centric approach
beyond technical design. International Journal on Advances in
Intelligent Systems, 3(1). Sullivan, C. (2018). Digital
identity–From emergent legal concept to new reality.Computer Law
& Security Review, 34(4), 723-731.
