The rise of online learning has brought about a close connection
between micro-credentials (MCs) and lifelong learning,
employability, and new digital education models. MCs are
considered instrumental in transforming higher education today.
This research has three (3) main aims. Firstly, it seeks to
assess the level of MC adoption in Malaysia, particularly from
the perspective of Higher Education Providers (HEPs). Secondly,
the study aims to elucidate the challenges faced by local
learners and MC developers, bridging the gap in comprehension
and implementation. Lastly, it seeks to identify the obstacles
HEPs encounter when offering MCs, encompassing technological,
organisational, and peole-related hindrances. By analysing
empirical data, this research intends to propose a conceptual
framework that can guide the successful adoption and
implementation of MCs within educational institutions. The
research endeavours to analyse empirical data to formulate a
conceptual framework for the effective adoption and integration
of MCs within educational institutions. These recommendations,
once implemented, can empower HEPs in Malaysia to successfully
incorporate MCs into their academic fabric. This not only
promises an enriched learning journey for students but also
contributes significantly to the broader transformation of
higher education. It aligns academia with the dynamic demands of
the digital age, fostering a culture of perpetual learning and
skill enhancement.
Micro-credentials (MCs) are officially recognised records that
demonstrate the completion of learning objectives during
shorter, less time-consuming educational or training events.
They concentrate on validating competency-based knowledge,
outcomes, and/or skills using trustworthy assessments and open
standards, which can improve graduates’ chances of finding
employment. An institution or organisation may accept MC for
credit or as an attestation for potential employers. Initially,
MCs were first established in online discussion forums and other
social media platforms to differentiate average users from
advanced users by awarding digital badges to the respondents who
completed the necessary assessments and assignments, for the
purposes of upskilling, as well as learning new skills (McGreal
& Olcott, 2022). Eventually, learners can earn a digital
badge and advance to the next selected digital badge once the
MCs are completed (Rottmann & Duggan, 2021).
Higher
education institutions should focus on formalising the position
for micro-credentialing in their programmes by developing
policies and associated taxonomies to guide this effort within
their institutions. Nevertheless, underlying the factors of
these flourishing concepts, it is essential to look at the
efforts and policy before further implementation to ensure that
the programmes are inherently suitable and add value.
03 problem statement
MCs are gaining importance in Malaysia as they promote flexible
learning. This study aims to assess the readiness of Malaysia to
adopt MCs and determine the most suitable adoption model. Higher
Education Providers (HEPs) can then implement appropriate
support and policies to overcome challenges and ensure
successful implementation, providing quality learning
experiences.
The current higher education system has
limitations in terms of cost and duration, posing a challenge
for working adults seeking academic qualifications or new
skills. However, the emergence of MCs offers an alternative
educational option with shorter completion times. Many
institutions have developed MC programmes to retrain and educate
the workforce, providing working adults with opportunities for
promotion and skill expansion within a shorter timeframe. These
certification programmes can be advantageous for individuals to
enhance their academic and personal development before entering
the job market.
As technology evolves, many skills
related to IT and other fields are becoming outdated and require
different skill sets to meet new job requirements and roles.
This is where MCs play a crucial role. MCs offer a way for
individuals to quickly acquire specific skills and knowledge
needed in these emerging roles. They are agile and responsive to
industry demands, making it possible for graduates to upskill or
reskill efficiently.
MCs can bridge the skills gap by
providing targeted, industry-relevant education. They enable
graduates to adapt to evolving job requirements, enhancing their
employability and reducing the risk of job mismatch. This
flexibility in learning and skill acquisition is vital in the
fast-changing landscape of work, helping individuals stay
competitive and aligned with the demands of modern careers. As
technology continues to reshape industries, MCs will play an
increasingly important role in preparing graduates for the jobs
of the future.
04 aims & objective
The research questions of this study focus on assessing the
readiness of Malaysia to adopt MCs and determining the most
suitable adoption model for implementation. It aims to
investigate the challenges faced by HEPs in offering MCs and
understand the perspectives of learners and developers in the
local context.
This research aims to provide valuable
insights into the current state of MC adoption in Malaysia, as
well as to examine the demand for MCs in the country.
Additionally, it seeks to assess the readiness of HEPs to
implement MCs from the perspectives of technological,
organisational, and people readiness. Furthermore, the research
objectives include proposing a best adaptation model or
conceptual framework based on empirical evidence for the
successful adoption and implementation of MCs within educational
institutions. Lastly, the framework will be tested and validated
through hypotheses. By addressing these research questions and
objectives, this study contributes to enhancing the quality and
accessibility of flexible learning options in Malaysia,
specifically focusing on the adoption and implementation of MCs
within the higher education sector.
05 literature review
Background of Micro-Credentials (MC) in Malaysia
MCs allow learners to gain specific skills in a shorter time.
MCs offer learners the opportunity to acquire targeted skills in
a more condensed timeframe. What sets them apart from
traditional education is the ability to track and display a
learner’s achievements through digital badges (Kiiskila et al.,
2022). Conventional degrees, in contrast, are often being
compared for their inability to effectively convey a learner’s
specific competencies. For instance, the employees can track and
verify their skills obtained with digital badges that are
transferable between stakeholders (Lim et. al., 2018). To this
extent, the MC programmes represent evidence of competence,
including the level of progression achieved. Besides, MCs have
increased the opportunities available in terms of flexibility
and competencies to learn in their own space. For example,
learners can choose between MCs and conventional degrees
according to their requirements and preferences.
The
Malaysian government’s dedication to MCs has indeed yielded
positive results, with a notable increase in the presence of
these programmes within the Malaysian higher education system.
The Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) has played a pivotal
role in this endeavour by introducing a comprehensive framework
that provides invaluable guidelines for the seamless
implementation and development of MCs in HEPs (MCMC, 2022).
Furthermore, collaborative efforts from various stakeholders in
shaping the MC landscape in Malaysia should be acknowledged,
too. Through the adoption of MQA guidelines, HEPs have also been
actively involved in designing and offering MC programmes that
cater to the diverse needs of learners and industries. In this
regard, industry experts and industries have contributed
significantly through constant feedback and engagement in
discussions. Thus, ensuring that MCs align with the evolving
demands of the job market. Additionally, professional bodies and
accreditation agencies have played a pivotal role in validating
the quality and relevance of these credentials, enhancing their
recognition and value. This collaborative approach ensures that
MC courses offered remain adaptable, credible, and valuable
assets in the dynamic landscape of higher education and the job
market in the country.
Organisations have played a
crucial part in enabling the development and spread of MCs
amongst Malaysian HEPs. Their contribution has been vital in
establishing the required infrastructure, including digital
platforms and support systems, for efficiently delivering MCs.
In addition, institutions have actively worked together with
industry partners to ensure that the MCs offered meet the
expectations and demands of the industry. The designing process
of MC is important for enhancing and revitalising individual
skill sets. Therefore, it is crucial to go beyond the
methodology and design when considering each specific level of
credentialing (Hernandez et al., 2014). To this extent, the key
factor is to improve the relationship between the credential
products and evaluating whether an organisational structure is
in place to assess the quality of the MC course and align with
the necessary skills and competencies.
Micro-Credentials Related to Communications and Multimedia
Communications and Multimedia (C&M) encompass different
aspects of using communications technology to transfer various
types of media data, such as continuous and discrete media. For
example, leveraging digital innovation, basic telecommunication
infrastructure and 5G technology for the seamless transmission
of multimedia content (Duklas, 2020). This is because digital
communication involves sensitive information and data, policy
and regulation, network security and others that is a crucial
role to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the
communication process (Salloum et al., 2018). The primary goal
of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC)
is to promote a competitive and efficient communications and
multimedia industry in Malaysia (MCMC, 2022). By focusing on the
development and regulation of communications and multimedia,
MCMC plays an important role in encouraging innovation and
ensuring the communications sector meets the evolving social and
economic needs in Malaysia.
Communications and Multimedia Advancements Necessitate Enhanced
Learners’ Digital Literacy Competencies
In Malaysia, ongoing advancements in communications and
multimedia have necessitated a profound redesign of strategies
for mediating its impacts and ensuring digital literacy
implementation. The impact of communications and multimedia
extends across various domains, including social interaction,
education, and the creative industry. The prevalence of digital
communication platforms necessitates digital literacy for
privacy protection, responsible online behaviour, and critical
thinking to combat misinformation. Secondly, multimedia’s role
in education is pivotal, with e-learning platforms and webinars
becoming indispensable. Digital literacy empowers students and
professionals to engage effectively with these resources,
enhancing learning outcomes and employability. Moreover, the
dynamic landscape of communication and multimedia underscores
the importance of digital literacy in Malaysia, affecting
everything from social interactions to education and economic
opportunities. Therefore, promoting digital literacy is crucial
for the country’s continued success in the digital era.
MCs
are valuable tools for students seeking to develop their digital
literacy skills. These skills are crucial both in academic and
employment contexts. MC programmes have proven effective in
helping learners establish their professional identities and use
digital badges as incentives (West & Cheng, 2022). These
badges symbolise learners’ dedication and the time they invest
in their learning journeys, encompassing various learning
materials and activities. By utilising MCs, learners can improve
their digital literacy and overall digital skill set.
The scope of MCs in the field of communications and multimedia
requires the need for formal standardisation. Standardisation in
MC programmes is essential to ensure HEPs, employers, and
employees alike are benefited. For HEPs, establishing a clear
framework for designing and delivering these credentials will
ensure consistency and quality across various offerings.
Standardisation also assists employers by providing a recognised
benchmark for assessing an individual’s digital communication
and multimedia skills, making the hiring process more
transparent and efficient. Additionally, employees benefit as
standardised MCs can enhance their credibility and mobility in
the job market, validating their expertise in this rapidly
evolving field.
Failing to address standardisation can carry significant risks.
Without clear standards, there is a risk of inconsistency in the
content and rigour of MC programmes, potentially diminishing
their value. Employers may face challenges in evaluating the
skills of job applicants, leading to hiring challenges and
ineffectiveness. For employees, a lack of standardised MCs
potentially opens the risks of investing time and money on
non-standardised MCs that do not align with industry needs and
do not favourably advance their career prospects.
The content and tracking of information within digital badges
are important considerations for learners when deciding which
badges to pursue (Lemoine & Richardson, 2015). The specific
details carried by the badges and the responsible organisations
for updating, storing, and displaying the information are
crucial factors (Pollard & Vincent, 2022). Learners often
compare digital badges earned to assess their value and
credibility. To facilitate this process, it is essential to
establish a standardised technological infrastructure for
verifying and validating badges. This standardisation would
simplify decision-making for learners and ensure transparency
and consistency in badge assessment.
In the context of this study, organisational readiness refers to
the preparedness of institutions or management to adopt MCs
effectively. In Malaysia, institutional preparedness for the
effective adoption of MCs is impacted by several vital factors.
Government support and policy development, which sets the
regulatory framework for institutions and robust technology
infrastructure and faculty training to ensure seamless MC
delivery. Institutional preparedness also includes recognising
MCs within the job market, emphasising accreditation and
industry recognition. Lastly, HEPs must embrace data analytics
for programme assessment. These interconnected factors
collectively drive organisational readiness and institutional
preparedness, enabling the successful integration of MCs into
Malaysia’s educational landscape.
One important aspect is maintaining the quality of the tasks or
assessments required to earn digital badges. This includes
ensuring that the staff involved in designing and evaluating
these tasks are properly trained and equipped with the necessary
knowledge and skills (Pollard & Vincent, 2022).
Additionally, organisations need to establish effective process
controls to ensure the consistency and reliability of the
assessment process. This involves implementing clear guidelines
and standards for evaluating and awarding digital badges, as
well as conducting regular quality assurance checks to uphold
the integrity of the credentials.
Education leaders must be more highly skilled and professional
to educate students to navigate society successfully. Educators
need to invest in accessible and relevant professional
development to advance their skill sets (Darling-Hammond &
Hyler, 2020). For example, HEPs need to strengthen the standards
of administrators and educators by enhancing their skills and
knowledge. In addition, the adult learning theory is largely
ignored, as the efforts also ignore the important trend of
educators to be competent enough to transfer the relevant skills
to the learners (Rubin & Brown, 2019). As technology
evolves, educators must adapt to the trend to push learning
experiences based on the latest learning technology methods.
Issues Identified Pertaining to Micro-Credential Implementation
The private sector is making an investment in many trainings and
learning offers, through a distinctive number of perspectives;
one is either as employers to support the process of upskilling/
reskilling the workforce or as content developers for MCs to be
competitive with regards to response and demand (Bideau &
Kearns, 2022). The IR 4.0 revolution has moderated the inception
of massive open online courses (MOOCs) facilitated by many
learning institutions, by which there is a collaboration between
education, the Industrial workforce, students and HEIs (Ghasia
et al., 2019). Hence, the unavailability of a global and
recognised credentialing system has put forth an opportunity for
the industrial sector, professional bodies, and licensing
organisations to offer credentialed services that are recognised
globally (Oliver, 2019) as depicted in Figure 1.
FIgure 1: Evolution of MC Ecosystem (Oliver, 2019)
Ensuring global acceptance and usefulness of MCs poses a
significant challenge in terms of establishing consistent
terminology in course design (Ministry of Communications and
Digital, 2023). These MC courses should be tailored to meet the
demands of learners seeking specific skill sets and knowledge
required for reskilling, upskilling, interpersonal skill
development, or Industry 4.0 competencies (Desmarchelier &
Cary, 2022). The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for
a digitalised and flexible lifestyle, leading to evolving
personal and professional situations. This unprecedented
situation presents an opportune moment to re-evaluate the
education system and prepare society for technological
advancements.
06 identification of critical success factors
Critical Technological Factors
MCs are digital badges or certifications that demonstrate a
learner’s skills or knowledge in a specific area of interest.
The increasing popularity of MCs has led to a need for
technological infrastructure readiness to support their delivery
and management. (Lockley et al., 2016) emphasise the investment
in key infrastructure in technology, in addition to curriculum,
policy, processes, and training. The technology ecosystem needs
to be robust enough to reduce manual work for both issuers and
learners, ensure quality and authenticity, and facilitate
visibility and compatibility of needs for employers (Markowitz,
2018). Some successful badges are co-created between the
potential employer and the university (Leaser & Gallagher,
2017), thus ensuring the quality for the possible future
employer from the beginning.
Recent studies have also
focused on emerging technologies that could enhance the
technological competency of MC design and delivery. In addition,
due to the wide array of terms and definitions presently being
used for MCs, an up-to-date taxonomy is needed. Blockchain
hosting of credentials, controlled by the students, is another
technology that needs more research (McGreal et al., 2022).
MCs
have gained popularity in recent years as a way for individuals
to acquire specific skills and knowledge that employers
recognise. These issues include data privacy, credential fraud,
platform reliability, and cybersecurity. For example,
(Infante-Moro et al., 2020) emphasise the importance of data
privacy in the design and delivery of MCs. They suggest that
micro-credentialing platforms should use secure data management
practices and provide learners with control over their personal
information.
Critical Organisational Factors
The organisational factor within HEPs plays a pivotal role in
shaping collective beliefs and attitudes toward MCs. The
perception of educators and their willingness to embrace these
credentials is a fundamental aspect of course success (Woods
& Woods, 2021). Establishing a collaborative environment and
fostering networking among HEPs during the development of MCs is
essential to ensure mutual support. This necessitates that every
stakeholder within HEPs comprehends their roles and actively
contributes to driving a transformative shift in learning (Kohl,
2019).
In addition, the management of HEPs is the
guideline for the implementation process for MC. Management
support is crucial to ensure effective leadership to provide
supportive strategies such as financial commitment, policy
implementation and investment (Howard & Babb, 2022). Apart
from the supportive management team, strategic alignment with MC
development is important. Therefore, the management team needs
to have a continuous investment in MC practices and procedures
(Rossiter & Tynan, 2019). For instance, having a monthly
meeting to check the strategies implemented to ensure the
progress is on track.
Critical People Factors
Learners’ motivation is a key element for the success of MCs, as
they proved to be more engaged and more likely to complete their
course and apply the skills learned (Kizilcec et al., 2013). The
support and guidance provided to learners also play an essential
role in the success of MCs (Green & Liem, 2019). For
example, learners who received feedback and personalised
coaching were more likely to complete their courses. Besides,
learners who receive support from instructors are more likely to
apply the skills in their work. The recognition and validation
of MCs by HEPs and other stakeholders can enhance the
credibility and reputation of the courses. In short, MCs are
claimed to be the factors to affect learners’ job
aspirations.
07 higher education providers framework for micro-credential
readiness
Based on the comprehensive evaluation conducted, a framework has
been identified and proposed to assess the readiness of HEPs in
implementing MCs, taking into consideration the technological,
organisational, and people-related factors.
As
discussed in previous sections, the significance of MCs in the
educational landscape has been established (Table 1). This
framework (Figure. 2) aims to identify and understand the impact
of each factor on the successful implementation of MCs within
HEPs. By considering the technological advancements,
organisational strategies, and the involvement of various
stakeholders, the framework provides a comprehensive and
holistic approach to assess the readiness of HEPs and guide them
in effectively implementing MCs.
Figure 2: HEPs Framework for MC Readiness
Table 1: Summary of Factors by Literature Support
Hypothesis Development
A comprehensive set of hypotheses has been put forward for the
purpose of testing and evaluating the readiness of HEPs to
successfully implement MCs. These hypotheses are designed to
assess various aspects and factors that contribute to the
capability of HEPs to adopt and integrate MCs into their
existing educational systems. Through rigorous examination and
analysis, these hypotheses aim to provide insights into the
level of preparedness and potential challenges that HEPs may
face when embarking on the implementation of MCs. By
systematically testing these hypotheses, valuable information
can be gathered to inform decision-making processes and ensure
the effective implementation of MCs within the higher education
landscape. The hypotheses’ relationship between factors and the
description of each element have been concluded in Figure 3 and
Table 2.
Figure 3: Hypothesis Development for Testing and Evaluating the
Readiness of HEPs
Table 2: Description of Each Hypothesis
08 methodology
introduction
Acceptance and adoption of MCs amongst HEPs remains relatively
low compared to other types of programmes offered. To gather
data on the acceptance and adoption of MCs in Malaysia, a
descriptive survey research approach will be utilised. This
survey will help identify the challenges faced by Malaysian HEPs
in delivering high-quality MC content (El-Farra et al., 2022).
Additionally, the descriptive research will provide a
comprehensive analysis and description of the current status of
MCs by HEPs in Malaysia.
To gain deeper insights into
the research questions and explore the main challenges
surrounding MCs and their importance amongst Malaysian HEPs, an
exploratory research method will be employed. Exploratory
research is particularly useful when investigating a new topic
with limited existing research (Swedberg, 2020). The theoretical
framework developed with the support of exploratory research
will explain the challenges encountered by institutions in
providing MCs to learners. The combination of these two (2)
research methods will provide a more comprehensive understanding
of the implementation status of MCs in Malaysia (Figure. 4 &
Figure 4.1).
FIgure 4: Research Process
A cross-sectional study was designed to study and investigate
the research objectives at a point in time. A mixed-method
approach was designed to integrate quantitative and qualitative
data within a single study. The mixed-method study is
particularly advantageous in collecting rich and comprehensive
data. For example, perception of the MC often integrates
quantitative data (scores determining prevalence) with
qualitative data by sharing of emotions and expression. To
obtain quantitative data, a survey questionnaire is adopted in
this present study, supported by the qualitative study through
interviews within focus groups. The main reason behind
integrating a mixed-method approach in this study is to allow
researchers to explore different perspectives and uncover
relationships related to the research questions (Shorten &
Smith, 2017). The quantitative data from this study helps in
analysing data regarding the demands of MC in multimedia and
communication fields. In addition, the qualitative study
provides opportunities for participants to reflect and share
feelings and experiences MC in multimedia and communication
fields. Through this method, qualitative study can help to
explain quantitative data with enriched evidence and enable
research questions to be answered more deeply (Shorten &
Smith, 2017).
Figure 4.1: Project Timeline
Target Respondents
A priori G* power analysis (Lakens & Caldwell, 2021) was
used to generate the minimum sample size required to detect
medium effect size, with 0.80 desired statistical power level.
Given the structural complexity of the model, the minimum sample
size required to detect the effect was 150. 200 participants
were targeted for this study, assuming less than 30 per cent of
incomplete or missing data may be excluded from the study. The
target groups are those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria
below:
• HEPs (Management and Educator). • Industry
relevant to communications and multimedia. • Individuals
aged 18-60 years old. • Able to provide consent
(verbal/written) to participate. • Understand
Bahasa Malaysia or English
Statistical Analysis
Data was analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version
22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The analysis followed a
per-protocol approach, which means that only participants with
valid baseline data and those who have completed at least one
(1) of the endpoint assessments according to their assigned
groups will be included in the analysis.
09 findings and analysis
Descriptive Analysis
Types of Higher Education Providers Targeted
558 respondents participated in the online survey to study the
readiness of HEPs to implement MCs from the perspectives of
Technological, Organisational, and People Readiness. The HEPs
participating comprised public universities, private
universities, vocational colleges, polytechnics, private
colleges, community colleges and skills institutes. The
breakdown of the institutions is summarised in the bar chart
below (Figure 5). Based on the bar chart, the highest number of
respondents were from public universities (25.9 per cent),
private universities (19.18 per cent), and vocational colleges
(17.03 per cent).
Figure 5: Types of HEPs which Participated in the Survey (%)
Types of Platforms
The bar chart below (Figure 6) shows the online learning
platforms (OLPs) which the HEPs preferred or intended to use
when implementing MCs. Based on the bar chart, most of the
institutions indicated a preference and intention to use Google
Classroom (22.65 per cent) as the platform for implementing MCs
followed by Moodle (18.93 per cent), Udemy (15.68 per cent), and
Coursera (13.82 per cent) as second, third and fourth choices
respectively. In order of preference the bar chart below also
clearly shows that Blackboard (4.3 per cent) is the least
preferred online platform for MC implementations.
Figure 6: HEPs OLPs preference and intention to use for
deploying MCs (%)
Current Implementation of Micro-Credentials amongst Higher
Education Providers in Malaysia
In this study, the status of MC adoption rate in Malaysia has
been investigated where the institutions were asked to describe
the institutional MC implementation or availability status via
survey. The current status of the MCs implementation stage
across institutions is shown in the table below. The respondents
were asked to rate between 0 to 4, and the representation of the
rating is shown below (Figure 7). At present, 6.99 per cent of
the HEPs do not intend to implement MC, while 15.41 per cent of
the HEPs are going to implement MC programmes in the next 12
months. On the other hand, 26.88 per cent of HEPs are in the
preliminary stage, 14.70 per cent are in the intermediate stage,
and 36.02 per cent are in the maturity stage.
Figure 7: Total Institutuions in Each Stage (%)
Current Micro-Credential Implementation Status by HEP Segment
Based on the findings of MC implementation status (Figure 8),
36.04 per cent of the skills institutes are planning to
implement MCs in the next 12 months. In the case of vocational
colleges, they are mostly in the in the maturity stage where
there are 32.34 per cent of them have all programmes offered in
MCs form. In contrast, there are only 10.26 per cent of the
vocational colleges have no intent to implement MCs (Level 0)
for the time being. With regards to community colleges 12 per
cent are at the preliminary stage of implementation (Level 2).
17.91 per cent of the polytechnics are at the mature status
level for MC programme implementation (Level 4). In the case of
private colleges, 12.67 per cent of them are in the preliminary
stage (Level 2), while only 4.48 per cent are in the maturity
stage (Level 4). Furthermore, nearly a third of all private
universities (32.67 per cent) are in the preliminary stage
(Level 2), while for public universities, 27.86 per cent of them
are in the maturity stage (Level 4).
Figure 8: MC Implementation Status by HEPs Segment (%)
Disciplines of Micro-Credentials Offered
The disciplines in which the institutions prefer to offer MC
were investigated through the survey. Figure 9 shows the
disciplines that the HEPs wish to offer as MCs. Based on the
results obtained, most of the institutions preferred to offer
MCs in medical sciences followed by engineering, Mathematics and
Statistics. Based on Hernandez et al. (2014), professional
practice in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(STEM) fields is expected to build students’ conceptual
knowledge and understanding of engineering and technology. This
indicates that STEM subjects may be suitable for MC
implementation, as they require practical skills and knowledge.
Hence, most institutions preferred to offer MCs related to STEM.
FIgure 9: Number of HEPs in Discipline Offered
Communications and Multimedia Micro-Credentials Courses Offered
by Higher Education Providers
The institutions were asked about the Multimedia and
Communication MCs courses that are or will be offered in their
institutions. Nine choices of Communication and Multimedia
related courses, namely Data Communication and Networking,
Multimedia Related Courses, Information Technology and
Multimedia, 4G and 5G Standards, Technologies and Architecture,
Modulation, Channel Equalisation and Diversity Techniques for
Mobile Radio Communication Systems, Data Communications and
Networking, Data & Network Security, Advanced Signal
Processing, and Multimedia-Based Instructional Design were
provided in the survey. Figure 10 shows the number of votes
received for each of the course choices. Based on the results
obtained, most of the institutions mentioned that their
institutions are or will be offering Information Technology and
Multimedia followed by Modulation, Channel Equalisation and
Diversity Techniques for Mobile Radio Communication Systems, 4G
and 5G Standards, and Technologies and Architecture courses.
Figure 10: C&M MC Courses by Number of HEPs
Reasons for Higher Education Providers to Implement
Micro-Credential
To understand the role of MCs from the higher education
providers’ perspective, the reasons for the institutions to
implement these courses were investigated. Figure 11 shows the
data obtained for this study. Most of the HEPs offered MCs as a
sample of diploma / undergraduate programmes. On the other hand,
institutions offered MCs since there are market needs from
industries which prefer MCs to conventional degree certificates.
This is because MCs are seen as a way of meeting upskilling
requirements for individuals looking to advance their careers
and to provide a skilled workforce for rapidly changing
industries (Desmarchelier & Cary, 2022; Oliver, 2019). Some
of the offerings in terms of MCs are Modulation, Channel
Equalisation and Diversity Techniques for Mobile Radio
Communication Systems and Information Technology and Multimedia
(multimedia programming).
Figure 11: Reasons for HEPs to Implement MC Programmes
Construction Validity and Reliability Test
Initially, this study proposed a set of 12 factors that were
expected to impact the implementation of MCs. However, it was
found that six (6) of these factors had a Cronbach’s Alpha value
lower than 0.7, indicating a weak interrelatedness among the
items (Ekolu & Quainoo, 2019). This implies that the
questionnaire used in the study did not include enough
questions, and the items with low alpha should be eliminated due
to their poor correlation (Tavakol & Dennick, 2011).
Furthermore, the factors with poor alpha values also resulted in
insignificant outcomes. Consequently, a step-by-step approach
was taken to remove the items with weak correlation one by one,
as depicted in Figure 12, until all remaining items achieved a
Cronbach’s Alpha value higher than 0.7.
Figure 12: The Analysis Process of The Research
Outer loading is important for the relationship between
construct and observable items. The accepted value for outer
loadings should be 0.4 and above, values of 0.7 are good (Hair
Jr. et al., 2021). As Table 2 shows, all items are higher than
0.4, and a majority of them are greater than 0.7. Besides, the
construct validity such as composite reliability (CR) and
Cronbach’s alpha are used to measure whether the collected items
are measuring the same characteristic consistently (Barbera et
al., 2020; Schrepp, 2020). One (1) way to determine the
construct validity is to have CR that is larger than 0.7, it is
the same as Cronbach’s alpha. As Table 3 shows, both composite
reliability and Cronbach’s alpha are all greater than 0.7. In
other words, this is a good sign of variance for a construct
held towards the measurement error. While Average Variance
Extracted (AVE) is a measure of the variance captured by a
construct in a relationship due to the measurement error. The
accepted value for AVE is any value higher than 0.5, while any
value less than 0.5 with CR higher than 0.6, the convergent
validity for a construct is still sufficient (Huang et al.,
2013; Lam, 2012). As Table 7 shows, the values of CR are all
higher than 0.6, and the AVE with 0.4 are accepted. This
indicated that the construct validity and reliability are both
satisfactory.
Table 3: Construct Validity and Reliability
Discriminant Validity Analysis
The Discriminant validity test is to determine whether the
construct is truly distinct from each other by empirical
standards. According to Henseler et al. (2015), the HTMT value
should be smaller than 1 to indicate that the true correlation
of the constructs is different from one and another. Another way
to access discriminant validity is to examine the value of the
Fornell-Larcker criterion, in which the accepted value should be
higher than the other correlation (Franke & Sarstedt, 2019).
As Table 4 shows, all the HTMT values are smaller than 1,
indicating a construct is different from the others. Table 5
indicates the value of the Fornell-Larcker criterion is all
larger than other correlations. To this extent, it can be
concluded the results proved the existence of discriminant
validity in this study.
Table 4: Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)
Table 5: Fornell-Larcker Criterion
Multicollinearity Analysis
Multicollinearity is present where there is a correlation
between multiple independent variables which can impact the
regression results (Gujarati, 2011). Besides, the importance of
multicollinearity analysis is to ensure that the framework can
be run correctly (Shrestha, 2020). Checking on the Variance
Inflation Factor (VIF) is one (1) of the measurements for
multicollinearity. Therefore, any value greater than 5 refers to
the existence of a multicollinearity issue. MS4 and Out6 were
removed due to the higher VIF, Table 6 shows, that the VIF value
for all items is smaller than 5 which means there are no
multicollinearity issues in this study.
Table 6: Multicollinearity Analysis
Hypothesis Testing
The hypothesis framework and each relationship are shown in the
figure below (Figure 13). It is believed that the Infrastructure
Readiness and Deliverables Competency under Technological
Factors have an impact for the HEPs to adopt MCs. Secondly, as
mentioned above, the Organisational Factors, including
Management Support and Quality Assurance are significant for
HEPs to prepare for MC adoption. Lastly, the People Factors such
as Competency Skillset and Learner Centricity are suggested to
have a positive effect on the HEPs to adopt MCs.
Figure 13: Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is used to determine the relationship between
each variable for a random sample, with a two-tailed 95 per cent
confidence level. The hypothesis test enables the evaluation of
the strength of the various hypotheses before implementing the
framework (Emmert-Streib & Dehmer, 2019). As shown in Table
7, the hypotheses were tested, and some of the factors are
insignificant. Therefore, there are only 4 hypotheses which are
significant (i.e. Infrastructure Readiness (H1), Organisational
Culture (H4), Customer Centricity (H8), and Quality Assurance
(H6).
Table 7: Hypothesis Testing
Discussion from Higher Education Providers’ Perspective
H1 has pointed out the significant relationship between
infrastructure readiness and the adoption of MCs. This is the
most significant factor for HEPs to implement MCs. HEPs should
allocate enough funds to acquire appropriate technology
infrastructure to provide the best online learning experience
for learners (Che Ahmat et al., 2021; Fischer et al., 2022). For
instance, the internet connectivity of the online platforms is
fundamental for online learning. Furthermore, collaborations
with third parties to provide subscriptions would be beneficial
in handling troubleshooting when users utilise the OLPs used in
delivering MCs (McGreal et al., 2022). For example, HEPs could
collaborate with providers of leading OLPs such as Moodle,
Google Classroom and Open Learning to provide the best and
smoothest learning experience for learners. Besides, H2 shows a
positive relationship between deliverables competency and
perceived outcome. This requires the HEPs to implement a
supportive and computing online learning environment to deliver
knowledge and skills to the learners (Mugayitoglu et al., 2021).
An example of a supportive learning environment could employ the
use of interactive video recordings and the inclusion of
built-in exercises to aid the learning of difficult topics.
Furthermore, convenient, and organised platforms are important
in delivering competencies for learners (Kumar et al., 2022).
For example, the HEPs need to ensure their online learning
platforms are smooth and supportive to ensure the maximum
effectiveness of the online learning experiences.
In
relation to critical organisational factors, H5 shows that
management support is significant for MC implementation.
Top-level management support in technical capabilities and
funding for support systems is critical for MC implementation
(Mathur et al., 2018). For example, the leadership perception to
support MC implementation is important and needs to be
communicated across the HEPs. In addition, the HEPs’ management
should put in more effort including admission, recruitment,
professional educators training and many more to ensure the
quality of MC provided (Ahsan et al., 2023). For instance, the
financial support from top management for MCs is critical. H9
refers to the positive relationship between quality assurance
and MC implementation. The quality assurance of MCs is critical
when it comes to the recognition of the new education forms. In
other words, this means the HEPs should establish a recognised
and standardised value for the MCs to improve the MCs status
(Fisher & Leder, 2022; Resei et al., 2019). For example, the
recognition of learning assessment across HEPs and industries
needs to be communicated and to agree on a standard examination
to recognise the digital badge earned. In addition, HEPs should
improve the teaching quality, to further analyse the operation
of MCs internationally. Besides, HEPs should also implement
quality assurance systems for online education including sharing
mechanisms, evaluation systems and operation models to ensure
the learning experience provided (Brown et al., 2021). To this
extent, learners can choose high-quality MCs to maximise their
learning experience.
As the results show, H10
indicates the greater the competency skillset, the larger the
readiness for HEPs to adopt MCs. This is because the HEPs should
have higher skills to educate learners successfully. For
example, the usage of blockchain technology by HEP educators can
provide better guidance for learners during online learning
(Alsobhi et al., 2023). In addition, the professional tools set
usage of educators can minimise the learners’ training time and
cost to achieve effective and efficient learning outcomes
(Wheelahan & Moodie, 2021). H11 shows that learner
centricity has a positive impact on MC implementation. This is
because the HEPs need to provide learning options comprising
online and face-to-face sessions to meet learners’ needs. Many
of the HEPs have focused on implementing online learning during
COVID-19 and forced the students to remain online. Therefore,
the ownership of choosing the option between online and
face-to-face can generate a better MC result that led to
effective learning outcomes (El-Farra et al., 2022; Rof et al.,
2023). In addition, the communication between educators and
learners can establish a trust-based relationship that can
smoothen the learning experience (Ramlall & Cross, 2021).
For example, with support from educators, learners can achieve
professional standards by having academic freedom such as
learning engagement.
10 summary & implications
Policy Implications for Micro-credential Adoption
Findings from the study have pointed out the importance of MCs
and the challenges faced by HEPs during the implementation
process. As such, it becomes critical that the development and
implementation of MCs at the HEP level be monitored and quality
assured (Tham & Chong, 2023). There have also been calls for
more centralised and standardised management of MCs to ensure
the equivalency and recognition of MCs throughout HEPs in
Malaysia (Sabtu & Ismail, 2022).
On this note,
the Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA), the education
accreditation body and agency tasked with the responsibility of
ensuring HEPs’ quality assurance, has continuously been a strong
facilitator and supporter of flexible education in Malaysia. One
such initiative in support of flexible education was the
development of the Guidelines to Good Practices: MCs (GGP) in
20201. The GGP was developed with the intention to serve as a
reference to the HEPs in the development of MCbased programmes
or courses. The GGP aimed to (1) support the implementation of
flexible learning by providing references to the stakeholders on
the introduction of MCs; (2) to facilitate and empower all types
of MCs whether it is used as supplementary or substituting
contents; and (3) to provide a policy on breaking down content
for recognition of stand-alone awards and credit transfer
purposes.
Higher Education Providers Readiness
In conclusion, while the popularity of MCs amongst the general
Malaysian population is still relatively low owing to poor
marketing and awareness levels, the degree of readiness amongst
Malaysian HEPs Indicates a favourable upward trend with more
recognising the potential of MCs in meeting the evolving needs
of learners and the job market both domestically and
internationally. This is especially seen in rapidly evolving
technological fields such as healthcare, C&M, and
engineering.
In conclusion, while the popularity of
MCs in the general Malaysian population is still relatively low
owing to poor marketing and awareness levels, the degree of
readiness amongst Malaysian HEPs is definitely indicating an
upward trend with more and more recognising the potential of MCs
in meeting the evolving needs of learners and the job market
both domestically and internationally. This is especially seen
in rapidly evolving technological fields such as healthcare,
communications & multimedia and engineering.
11 recommendations
Government facilitation and policy
The current study proposes several recommendations to enhance
the recognition and value of MC programmes in the field of
communications and multimedia. Firstly, it is recommended that
government agencies and universities establish a centralised
system for recognising and accrediting MC programmes. This would
create a transparent ecosystem where industry players and
service providers can ensure the widespread acceptance and value
of these programmes for learners. Efforts should be made to
develop a framework that guarantees the quality and rigour of
MCs, ensuring their recognition by employers, educational
institutions, and other relevant stakeholders. Involving
industry players in the development of programme content can
ensure that the programmes align with the demands of the global
market, thereby enhancing the reputation and recognition of MC
programmes.
Additionally, the government could,
through its various agencies, implement policies which
facilitate and promote the take-up of MCs. For instance, this
could be done by enabling flexible learning pathways through the
implementation of “Training Leave”. Currently, learners often
have to take personal leave to attend different MC programmes.
However, MCs offer the advantage of flexible learning, allowing
individuals to acquire skills and credentials at their own pace
and convenience. By leveraging online platforms and digital
technologies, accessible and personalised learning experiences
can be provided. Therefore, by introducing policies that allow
employees to utilise “Training Leave” for upskilling purposes,
both employers and employees can benefit. This approach would
enhance the competitiveness and competency of Malaysia’s
workforce in the globalised market.
Overall, these
recommendations aim to establish a recognised and valued
ecosystem for MCs in Communication and Multimedia, promote
flexible learning pathways, and empower employees to enhance
their skills and competencies in alignment with the demands of
the modern job market.
The Malaysian Qualifications
Agency (MQA) plays a pivotal role in the implementation of MCs
within HEPs. Firstly, MQA should take on the responsibility of
monitoring and ensuring quality assurance for the development of
MCs at the HEPs’ level. This would involve rigorous assessment
and evaluation to maintain high standards in MC programmes.
Secondly, MQA can contribute significantly to the promotion of
flexible education in Malaysia by actively supporting the
integration of MCs into the educational landscape. Additionally,
MQA should take the lead in establishing a clear and
comprehensive definition of MCs while outlining key principles
for their development and delivery, ensuring consistency and
clarity across the board. Lastly, MQA could mandate HEPs to
register their MC programmes, thereby embedding quality
assurance measures into the design and delivery of these
credentials, ultimately enhancing the value and credibility of
MCs within the Malaysian education system.
Collaborative Approach in Ensuring Value and Alignment
HEPs play a crucial role in the successful integration of MC
programmes in Malaysia. To begin with, there is a pressing need
for HEPs to enhance the promotion of MC programmes, as awareness
and marketing efforts have been inadequate thus far. Moreover,
fostering collaborative relationships between HEPs, industry
experts, and employers is imperative to bridge the significant
gap between academia and the dynamic job market. HEPs should
allocate sufficient financial resources and invest in digital
technologies to facilitate MC learning effectively. Equally
important is the continuous training and development of
educators to equip them with the skills necessary to design and
deliver interactive, engaging, and effective MC-based lessons,
ensuring that learners derive maximum benefit from these
innovative programmes.
Moving forward for the future
direction for MCs in Malaysia involves a multi-stage approach.
To propel the implementation of MC programmes effectively, it is
imperative to establish a harmonised integration between
conventional degree programmes and MC offerings, creating
diverse and flexible learning pathways. Additionally, the focus
should be on enhancing industry recognition and credibility and
aligning MC programmes, employers’ needs, and expectations.
Promoting lifelong learning within the workplace is essential to
facilitate continuous professional and career development,
making MC an integral part of this journey. Furthermore,
leveraging technological advancements for secure and efficient
MC delivery is crucial.
In the development of new MC
programmes, collaboration with industry stakeholders through
group discussions is vital to identify the specific skills and
knowledge demanded by the job market. Standardising syllabi
ensures transparency and consistency across MC offerings.
Exploring options to cover MC learning fees under the Human
Resources Development Cooperation (HRDC) can boost acceptance
and motivation among learners, making MCs a more accessible and
appealing choice for professional development. These
recommendations and strategies pave the way for a promising
future for MCs in Malaysia’s educational landscape.
12 acknowledgement
This research project is jointly funded by Malaysian
Communications and Multimedia Commission Digital Society
Research Grant Project Code: MCMC(RED)700-8/2/11/JLD.4(15) and
UCSI University REIG Grant Project Code REIG-ICSDI-2022/070
13 references
Ahsan, K., Akbar, S., Kam, B., & Abdulrahman, M. D. A.
(2023). Implementation of micro-credentials in higher education:
A systematic literature review. Education and Information
Technologies, 1–36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-11739-Z/TABLES/3
Alsobhi, H. A., Alakhtar, R. A., Ubaid, A., Hussain, O. K.,
& Hussain, F. K. (2023). Blockchain-based micro
credentialing system in higher education institutions:
Systematic literature review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 265,
110238.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2022.110238
Barbera, J., Naibert, N., Komperda, R., & Pentecost, T. C.
(2020). Clarity on Cronbach’s Alpha Use. Journal of Chemical
Education, 98(2), 257258.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.0C00183
Bideau, Y.-M., & Kearns, T. (2022). A European Approach to
Micro credentials for Lifelong Learning and Employability.
Journal of European CME, 11(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2022.2147288
Brown, M., Nic, M., Mhichil, G., Beirne, E., & Lochlainn, C.
Mac. (2021). The Global Micro-Credential Landscape: Charting a
New Credential Ecology for Lifelong Learning. Journal of
Learning for Development, 8(2), 228–254.
Che Ahmat, N. H., Bashir, M. A. A., Razali, A. R., &
Kasolang, S. (2021). Micro Credentials in Higher Education
Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities. Asian Journal of
University Education, 17(3), 281–290.
https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V17I3.14505
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing
educators for the time of COVID ... and beyond. European Journal
of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
Desmarchelier, R., & Cary, L. J. (2022). Toward just and
equitable micro-credentials: an Australian perspective.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 19(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00332-Y/METRICS
Duklas, J. (2020). Micro Credentials: Trends in Credit Transfer
and Credentialing. British Columbia Council on Admissions and
Transfer.
Ekolu, S. O., & Quainoo, H. (2019). Reliability of
assessments in engineering education using Cronbach’s alpha, KR
and spliy-half methods. Global Journal of Engineering Education,
21(1), 24–29.
El-Farra, S. A., Mohaidat, J. M., Aldajah, S. H., &
Alshamsi, A. M. (2022). Alternative Digital Credentials—UAE’s
First Adopters’ Quality Assurance Model and Case Study. Lecture
Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 104,
339–359.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_25/COVER
Emmert-Streib, F., & Dehmer, M. (2019). Understanding
Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical
Inference. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 2019, Vol.
1, Pages 945-961, 1(3), 945–961.
https://doi.org/10.3390/MAKE1030054
Fischer, T., Oppl, S., & Stabauer, M. (2022).
Micro-Credential Development: Tools, Methods and Concepts
Supporting the European Approach. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022
Proceedings.
Fisher, R. M., & Leder, H. (2022). An assessment of
micro-credentials in New Zealand vocational education.
International Journal of Training Research, 20(3), 232–247.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.2018018
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus
statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of
four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447.
https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2017-0515/FULL/PDF
Ghasia, M., Machumu, H., & Smet, E. (2019).
Micro-credentials in higher education institutions: An
exploratory study of its place in Tanzania. International
Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 15(1).
Green, J., & Liem, G. A. D. (2019). Designing
Microcredentials for Competency-Based Education: Insights From
the Field. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 4(1), 1–11.
Gujarati, D. (2011). Econometrics by Example. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M.,
Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares
Structural Equation Modeling (PLS SEM) Using R. Springer Nature.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new
criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based
structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-014-0403-8/FIGURES/8
Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B.,
Rambo-Hernandez K. E., Chen, T. W., & de Miranda, M. A.
(2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an
integrated engineering design intervention. International
Journal of Technology and Design Education 2013 24:1, 24(1),
107–120.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-013-9241-0
Howard, E., & Babb, D. (2022). FLOC, Facilitating Learning
Online Certification Workshop Part of the Micro-Credential
series for online teaching certification. Online Journal of
Distance Learning Administration, 25(3).
Huang, C.-C., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, T. W., & Wang, P.-A. (2013).
An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents and Performance
Consequences of Using the Moodle Platform. International Journal
of Information Education Technology, 3(2).
Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Gallardo-Perez, J.
(2020). The Employment Possibilities of the Internet of Things
in the Hotel Sector and its Training Needs. Ediciones
Universidad de Salamanca.
Kiiskila, P., Hanafy, A., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2022).
Features of Micro-Credential Platforms in Higher Education A Set
of Studies on Technostress and Coping View project ECIU
(European Consortium of Innovative Universities) View project
Features of Micro-Credential Platforms in Higher Education.
CSEDU, 1, 81–91.
https://doi.org/10.5220/0011030600003182
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013).
Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations
in massive open online courses. ACM International Conference
Proceeding Series, 170–179.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Kohl, A. (2019). Establishing A Programme For Teacher Micro
Credentials To Support Individual Professional Learning.
Dissertations.
Koronios, K., Kriemadis, A., Dimitropoulos, P., &
Papadopoulos, A. (2019). A values framework for measuring the
influence of ethics and motivation regarding the performance of
employees. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1),
2241–2312.
Kumar, J. A., Richard, R. J., Osman, S., & Lowrence, K.
(2022). Micro credentials in leveraging emergency remote
teaching: the relationship between novice users’ insights and
identity in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational
Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00323-Z
Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-Based Power
Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs. Association
for Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–14.
Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s
commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9),
1328–1334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2011.10.026
Lemoine, P. A., & Richardson, M. D. (2015).
Micro-Credentials, Nano Degrees, and Digital Badges: New
Credentials for Global Higher Education. International Journal
of Technology and Educational Marketing, 5(1), 36–49.
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEM.2015010104
Lim, C. L., Nair, P. K., Keppell, M. J., Hassan, N., & Ayub,
E. (2018). Developing a framework for the university-wide
implementation of micro-credentials and digital badges: A case
study from a Malaysian private university. 2018 IEEE 4th
International Conference on Computer and Communications, ICCC
2018, 1715–1719.
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPCOMM.2018.8780706
Lockley, A., Derryberry, A., & West, D. (2016). Drivers,
affordances and challenges of digital badges. Foundation of
Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials: Demonstrating and
Recognizing Knowledge and Competencies, 55–70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_4/COVER
Mathur, A., Wood, M. E., & Cano, A. (2018). Mastery of
Transferrable Skills by Doctoral Scholars: Visualization using
Digital Micro credentialing. Change: The Magazine of Higher
Learning, 50(5), 38–45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1510261
McGill, T., Ross, J., & Schauder, D. (2020). Factors that
influence learners’ decisions to adopt and complete
micro-credentials. Distance Education, 41(2), 239–255.
McGreal, R., Mackintosh, W., Cox, G., & Olcott, D. (2022).
Bridging the Gap: Micro-credentials for Development UNESCO
Chairs Policy Brief Form - Under the III World Higher Education
Conference (WHEC 2021) Type: Collective X. International Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 23(3), 288–302.
https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V23I3.6696
Mugayitoglu, B., Borowczak, M., & Burrows, A. C. (2021). A
University’s Developmental Framework: Creating, Implementing,
and Evaluating a K-12 Teacher Cybersecurity Micro-credential
Course. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 19(2).
Ramlall, S., & Cross, T. (2021). The Shift to Virtual
Learning and the Impact on Higher Education. Tackling Online
Education: Implications of Responses to COVID-19 in Higher
Education Globally.
https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Nrc-EAAAQBA
J&oi=fnd&pg=PA88&dq=learner+centricity+for+micro+credential&ots=SbP2nSBfT1&si
g=NBeFEUyCGphzL0Rzx7ucuDAQ624&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Resei, C., Friedl, C., Staubitz, T., & Rohloff, T. (2019).
RESULT 1.1c MICRO-CREDENTIALS IN EU AND GLOBAL MICRO-CREDENTIALS
IN EU AND GLOBAL. In Corporate Edupreneurship.
Rof, A., Bikfalvi, A., & Marques, P. (2023). Digital
Transformation in Higher Education: Intelligence in Systems and
Business Models. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 549,
429–452.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_18/COVER
Rossiter, D., & Tynan, B. (2019). Designing and Implementing
Micro Credentials: A Guide for Practitioners. Commonwealth of
Learning (COL).
Sabtu, A., & Ismail, S. A. (2022). Using Malaysian
Qualifications Agency (MQA) Standards as a “Wake-Up Call” to
Information Resource Assessment: An early view.
Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI9), 365-372.
https://doi.org/10.21834/EBPJ.V7ISI9.4287
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2018). The
Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Information Systems: A Review.
Communications in Computer and Information Science, 877, 94–106.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_9
Schrepp, M. (2020). On the Usage of Cronbach’s Alpha to Measure
Reliability of UX Scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 15,
247–258.
Selvaratnam, R., & Sankey, M. (2019). Micro credentialing as
a sustainable way forward for universities in Australia:
Perceptions of the landscape. ACODE Whitepaper.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337884817
Shanahan, B. W., & Organ, J. (2022). Harnessing the Benefits
of Micro Credentials for Industry 4.0 and 5.0: Skills Training
and Lifelong Learning. IFAC PapersOnLine, 55(39), 82–87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2022.12.015
Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research:
expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(3),
74–75.
https://doi.org/10.1136/EB-2017102699
Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting Multicollinearity in Regression
Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and
Statistics, 8(2), 39–42.
https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1
Swedberg, R. (2020). ExploratoryResearch. In C. Elman,
J.Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge:
Enhancing Progress in Social Science - Google Books. Cambridge
University Press.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of
Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2,
53.
https://doi.org/10.5116/IJME.4DFB.8DFD
Tham, S. Y., & Chong, P. Y. (2023). Transforming Malaysia’s
Higher Education: Policies and Progress. Asian Economic Policy
Review.
https://doi.org/10.1111/AEPR.12417
West, R. E., & Cheng, Z. (2022). Digital Credential
Evolution How Open Microcredentials/ Badges Support Learning in
Micro-, Meso-, Macro-levels.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_71-1
Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2021). Analysing
micro-credentials in higher education: a Bernsteinian analysis.
Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 212–228.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887358
Woods, K., & Woods, J. A. (2021). Less Is More: Exploring
the Value of Micro-Credentials Within a Graduate Programme. The
Journal of Continuing Higher Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2021.1966923
up next:
Public and Governmental Sector Adoption of Digital Signature
Usage for E-Government Initiatives
by Ts. Dr. Nur Hani Zulkifli Abai, Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Shamshuritawati Sharif, Dr. Mawarny Md Rejab,
Mr. Suwannit Chareen Chit A/L Sop Chit and Assoc.
Prof. Ts. Dr. Mohamad Fadli Zolkipli