Topic 04: How Ready Are Higher Education Providers to Implement Communications and Multimedia Micro-Credentials?
An Assessment of Challenges and Readiness of Higher Education Providers

How Ready Are Higher Education Providers to Implement Communications and Multimedia Micro-Credentials?

An Assessment of Challenges and Readiness of Higher Education Providers

Assoc. Prof. Dr Koey Kay Hooi

Lead Researcher
Graduate Business School
UCSI University

Ms. Teoh Wai Yee

Team Member
Academic Management Office
UCSI University

Assoc Prof. Dr. Lionel In Lian Aun

Team Member
Faculty of Applied Sciences
UCSI University

Ms. Koh Yung Jing

Team Member
Graduate Business School
UCSI University

Madam Lilian Kek Siew Yick

Team Member
Centre for Academic Quality and Assurance
UCSI University

Dr. Tan Siew Tin

Team Member
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia
UCSI University

Asst. Prof. Dr Javid Iqbal

Team Member
Institute of Computer Science and Digital Innovation
UCSI University

Asst. Prof. Dr Neesha Jothi

Team Member
Institute of Computer Science and DIgital Innovation
UCSI University

Assoc Prof. Dr Ooi Pei Boon

External Collaborator
Department of Medical Sciences, Sunway University

Asst. Prof. Dr. Shaik Shabana Anjum

Team Member
Institute of Computer Science and Digital Innovation
UCSI University

Asst. Prof. Dr Heshalini A/P Rajagopal @ Ramasamy

Team Member
Institute of Computer Science and Digital Innovation
UCSI University

Assoc. Prof. Dr Pek Chuen Khee

External Collaborator
Taylor’s Business School, Taylor’s University

Asst. Prof. Dr. Ho Meng Chuan

Team Member
Centre for Pre-U Studies (Springhill Campus)
UCSI University

Prof. Datuk. Dr. Rohana Binti Yusof

Team Member
Academic Management Office
UCSI University

Dr Yeo Sook Fern

External Collaborator
Faculty of Business, Multimedia University

Table of contents

01  abstract02  introduction03 problem statement04  aims & objectives05  literature reviewBackground of Micro-Credentials (MC) in MalaysiaMicro-Credentials Related to Communications and MultimediaCommunications and Multimedia Advancements Necessitate Enhanced Learners’ Digital Literacy CompetenciesHigher Education Providers Micro- Credential ChallengesIssues Identified Pertaining to Micro-Credential Implementation06  Identification of Critical Success FactorCritical Technological FactorsCritical Organisational FactorsCritical People Factors07  Higher Education Providers Framework for Micro-Credential ReadinessHypothesis Development08  methodologyIntroductionTarget Respondents
Statistical Analysis
09  findings and analysisDescriptive Analysis
Types of Higher Education Providers Targeted
Types of Platforms
Current Implimentation of Micro-Credentials Amongst Higher Education Providers in Malaysia
Current Micro-Credential Implementation Status by HEP Segment
Disciplines of Micro-Credentials Offered
Communications and Multimedia Micro-Credentials Courses Offered by Higher Education Providers
Reasons for Higher Education to Implement Micro-Credential
Construction Validity and Reliability Test
Discriminant Validity Analysis
Multicollinearity Analysis
Hypothesis Testing
Discussion from Higher Education Providers' Perspective
10  summary & implicationsPolicy Implications for Micro-credential Adoption
Higher Education Providers Readiness
11  recommendationsGovernment facilitation and policy
Collaborative Approach in Ensuring Value and Alignment
12  acknowledgement13  references

01 ABSTRACT

The rise of online learning has brought about a close connection between micro-credentials (MCs) and lifelong learning, employability, and new digital education models. MCs are considered instrumental in transforming higher education today. This research has three (3) main aims. Firstly, it seeks to assess the level of MC adoption in Malaysia, particularly from the perspective of Higher Education Providers (HEPs). Secondly, the study aims to elucidate the challenges faced by local learners and MC developers, bridging the gap in comprehension and implementation. Lastly, it seeks to identify the obstacles HEPs encounter when offering MCs, encompassing technological, organisational, and peole-related hindrances. By analysing empirical data, this research intends to propose a conceptual framework that can guide the successful adoption and implementation of MCs within educational institutions. The research endeavours to analyse empirical data to formulate a conceptual framework for the effective adoption and integration of MCs within educational institutions. These recommendations, once implemented, can empower HEPs in Malaysia to successfully incorporate MCs into their academic fabric. This not only promises an enriched learning journey for students but also contributes significantly to the broader transformation of higher education. It aligns academia with the dynamic demands of the digital age, fostering a culture of perpetual learning and skill enhancement.
Keywords: Micro-Credentials; Adoption Readiness; Technological Management; Educational System; Higher Education Provider; Quality Education

02 introduction

Micro-credentials (MCs) are officially recognised records that demonstrate the completion of learning objectives during shorter, less time-consuming educational or training events. They concentrate on validating competency-based knowledge, outcomes, and/or skills using trustworthy assessments and open standards, which can improve graduates’ chances of finding employment. An institution or organisation may accept MC for credit or as an attestation for potential employers. Initially, MCs were first established in online discussion forums and other social media platforms to differentiate average users from advanced users by awarding digital badges to the respondents who completed the necessary assessments and assignments, for the purposes of upskilling, as well as learning new skills (McGreal & Olcott, 2022). Eventually, learners can earn a digital badge and advance to the next selected digital badge once the MCs are completed (Rottmann & Duggan, 2021).

Higher education institutions should focus on formalising the position for micro-credentialing in their programmes by developing policies and associated taxonomies to guide this effort within their institutions. Nevertheless, underlying the factors of these flourishing concepts, it is essential to look at the efforts and policy before further implementation to ensure that the programmes are inherently suitable and add value.

03 problem statement

MCs are gaining importance in Malaysia as they promote flexible learning. This study aims to assess the readiness of Malaysia to adopt MCs and determine the most suitable adoption model. Higher Education Providers (HEPs) can then implement appropriate support and policies to overcome challenges and ensure successful implementation, providing quality learning experiences.

The current higher education system has limitations in terms of cost and duration, posing a challenge for working adults seeking academic qualifications or new skills. However, the emergence of MCs offers an alternative educational option with shorter completion times. Many institutions have developed MC programmes to retrain and educate the workforce, providing working adults with opportunities for promotion and skill expansion within a shorter timeframe. These certification programmes can be advantageous for individuals to enhance their academic and personal development before entering the job market.

As technology evolves, many skills related to IT and other fields are becoming outdated and require different skill sets to meet new job requirements and roles. This is where MCs play a crucial role. MCs offer a way for individuals to quickly acquire specific skills and knowledge needed in these emerging roles. They are agile and responsive to industry demands, making it possible for graduates to upskill or reskill efficiently.

MCs can bridge the skills gap by providing targeted, industry-relevant education. They enable graduates to adapt to evolving job requirements, enhancing their employability and reducing the risk of job mismatch. This flexibility in learning and skill acquisition is vital in the fast-changing landscape of work, helping individuals stay competitive and aligned with the demands of modern careers. As technology continues to reshape industries, MCs will play an increasingly important role in preparing graduates for the jobs of the future.

04 aims & objective

The research questions of this study focus on assessing the readiness of Malaysia to adopt MCs and determining the most suitable adoption model for implementation. It aims to investigate the challenges faced by HEPs in offering MCs and understand the perspectives of learners and developers in the local context.

This research aims to provide valuable insights into the current state of MC adoption in Malaysia, as well as to examine the demand for MCs in the country. Additionally, it seeks to assess the readiness of HEPs to implement MCs from the perspectives of technological, organisational, and people readiness. Furthermore, the research objectives include proposing a best adaptation model or conceptual framework based on empirical evidence for the successful adoption and implementation of MCs within educational institutions. Lastly, the framework will be tested and validated through hypotheses. By addressing these research questions and objectives, this study contributes to enhancing the quality and accessibility of flexible learning options in Malaysia, specifically focusing on the adoption and implementation of MCs within the higher education sector.

05 literature review

Background of Micro-Credentials (MC) in Malaysia

MCs allow learners to gain specific skills in a shorter time. MCs offer learners the opportunity to acquire targeted skills in a more condensed timeframe. What sets them apart from traditional education is the ability to track and display a learner’s achievements through digital badges (Kiiskila et al., 2022). Conventional degrees, in contrast, are often being compared for their inability to effectively convey a learner’s specific competencies. For instance, the employees can track and verify their skills obtained with digital badges that are transferable between stakeholders (Lim et. al., 2018). To this extent, the MC programmes represent evidence of competence, including the level of progression achieved. Besides, MCs have increased the opportunities available in terms of flexibility and competencies to learn in their own space. For example, learners can choose between MCs and conventional degrees according to their requirements and preferences.

The Malaysian government’s dedication to MCs has indeed yielded positive results, with a notable increase in the presence of these programmes within the Malaysian higher education system. The Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) has played a pivotal role in this endeavour by introducing a comprehensive framework that provides invaluable guidelines for the seamless implementation and development of MCs in HEPs (MCMC, 2022). Furthermore, collaborative efforts from various stakeholders in shaping the MC landscape in Malaysia should be acknowledged, too. Through the adoption of MQA guidelines, HEPs have also been actively involved in designing and offering MC programmes that cater to the diverse needs of learners and industries. In this regard, industry experts and industries have contributed significantly through constant feedback and engagement in discussions. Thus, ensuring that MCs align with the evolving demands of the job market. Additionally, professional bodies and accreditation agencies have played a pivotal role in validating the quality and relevance of these credentials, enhancing their recognition and value. This collaborative approach ensures that MC courses offered remain adaptable, credible, and valuable assets in the dynamic landscape of higher education and the job market in the country.

Organisations have played a crucial part in enabling the development and spread of MCs amongst Malaysian HEPs. Their contribution has been vital in establishing the required infrastructure, including digital platforms and support systems, for efficiently delivering MCs. In addition, institutions have actively worked together with industry partners to ensure that the MCs offered meet the expectations and demands of the industry. The designing process of MC is important for enhancing and revitalising individual skill sets. Therefore, it is crucial to go beyond the methodology and design when considering each specific level of credentialing (Hernandez et al., 2014). To this extent, the key factor is to improve the relationship between the credential products and evaluating whether an organisational structure is in place to assess the quality of the MC course and align with the necessary skills and competencies.

Micro-Credentials Related to Communications and Multimedia

Communications and Multimedia (C&M) encompass different aspects of using communications technology to transfer various types of media data, such as continuous and discrete media. For example, leveraging digital innovation, basic telecommunication infrastructure and 5G technology for the seamless transmission of multimedia content (Duklas, 2020). This is because digital communication involves sensitive information and data, policy and regulation, network security and others that is a crucial role to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the communication process (Salloum et al., 2018). The primary goal of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is to promote a competitive and efficient communications and multimedia industry in Malaysia (MCMC, 2022). By focusing on the development and regulation of communications and multimedia, MCMC plays an important role in encouraging innovation and ensuring the communications sector meets the evolving social and economic needs in Malaysia.

Communications and Multimedia Advancements Necessitate Enhanced Learners’ Digital Literacy Competencies

In Malaysia, ongoing advancements in communications and multimedia have necessitated a profound redesign of strategies for mediating its impacts and ensuring digital literacy implementation. The impact of communications and multimedia extends across various domains, including social interaction, education, and the creative industry. The prevalence of digital communication platforms necessitates digital literacy for privacy protection, responsible online behaviour, and critical thinking to combat misinformation. Secondly, multimedia’s role in education is pivotal, with e-learning platforms and webinars becoming indispensable. Digital literacy empowers students and professionals to engage effectively with these resources, enhancing learning outcomes and employability. Moreover, the dynamic landscape of communication and multimedia underscores the importance of digital literacy in Malaysia, affecting everything from social interactions to education and economic opportunities. Therefore, promoting digital literacy is crucial for the country’s continued success in the digital era.

MCs are valuable tools for students seeking to develop their digital literacy skills. These skills are crucial both in academic and employment contexts. MC programmes have proven effective in helping learners establish their professional identities and use digital badges as incentives (West & Cheng, 2022). These badges symbolise learners’ dedication and the time they invest in their learning journeys, encompassing various learning materials and activities. By utilising MCs, learners can improve their digital literacy and overall digital skill set.

Higher Education Providers Micro-Credential Challenges

The scope of MCs in the field of communications and multimedia requires the need for formal standardisation. Standardisation in MC programmes is essential to ensure HEPs, employers, and employees alike are benefited. For HEPs, establishing a clear framework for designing and delivering these credentials will ensure consistency and quality across various offerings. Standardisation also assists employers by providing a recognised benchmark for assessing an individual’s digital communication and multimedia skills, making the hiring process more transparent and efficient. Additionally, employees benefit as standardised MCs can enhance their credibility and mobility in the job market, validating their expertise in this rapidly evolving field.

Failing to address standardisation can carry significant risks. Without clear standards, there is a risk of inconsistency in the content and rigour of MC programmes, potentially diminishing their value. Employers may face challenges in evaluating the skills of job applicants, leading to hiring challenges and ineffectiveness. For employees, a lack of standardised MCs potentially opens the risks of investing time and money on non-standardised MCs that do not align with industry needs and do not favourably advance their career prospects.

The content and tracking of information within digital badges are important considerations for learners when deciding which badges to pursue (Lemoine & Richardson, 2015). The specific details carried by the badges and the responsible organisations for updating, storing, and displaying the information are crucial factors (Pollard & Vincent, 2022). Learners often compare digital badges earned to assess their value and credibility. To facilitate this process, it is essential to establish a standardised technological infrastructure for verifying and validating badges. This standardisation would simplify decision-making for learners and ensure transparency and consistency in badge assessment.

In the context of this study, organisational readiness refers to the preparedness of institutions or management to adopt MCs effectively. In Malaysia, institutional preparedness for the effective adoption of MCs is impacted by several vital factors. Government support and policy development, which sets the regulatory framework for institutions and robust technology infrastructure and faculty training to ensure seamless MC delivery. Institutional preparedness also includes recognising MCs within the job market, emphasising accreditation and industry recognition. Lastly, HEPs must embrace data analytics for programme assessment. These interconnected factors collectively drive organisational readiness and institutional preparedness, enabling the successful integration of MCs into Malaysia’s educational landscape.

One important aspect is maintaining the quality of the tasks or assessments required to earn digital badges. This includes ensuring that the staff involved in designing and evaluating these tasks are properly trained and equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills (Pollard & Vincent, 2022). Additionally, organisations need to establish effective process controls to ensure the consistency and reliability of the assessment process. This involves implementing clear guidelines and standards for evaluating and awarding digital badges, as well as conducting regular quality assurance checks to uphold the integrity of the credentials.

Education leaders must be more highly skilled and professional to educate students to navigate society successfully. Educators need to invest in accessible and relevant professional development to advance their skill sets (Darling-Hammond & Hyler, 2020). For example, HEPs need to strengthen the standards of administrators and educators by enhancing their skills and knowledge. In addition, the adult learning theory is largely ignored, as the efforts also ignore the important trend of educators to be competent enough to transfer the relevant skills to the learners (Rubin & Brown, 2019). As technology evolves, educators must adapt to the trend to push learning experiences based on the latest learning technology methods.

Issues Identified Pertaining to Micro-Credential Implementation

The private sector is making an investment in many trainings and learning offers, through a distinctive number of perspectives; one is either as employers to support the process of upskilling/ reskilling the workforce or as content developers for MCs to be competitive with regards to response and demand (Bideau & Kearns, 2022). The IR 4.0 revolution has moderated the inception of massive open online courses (MOOCs) facilitated by many learning institutions, by which there is a collaboration between education, the Industrial workforce, students and HEIs (Ghasia et al., 2019). Hence, the unavailability of a global and recognised credentialing system has put forth an opportunity for the industrial sector, professional bodies, and licensing organisations to offer credentialed services that are recognised globally (Oliver, 2019) as depicted in Figure 1.
Asset 1 (1634x1178)
FIgure 1: Evolution of MC Ecosystem (Oliver, 2019)
Ensuring global acceptance and usefulness of MCs poses a significant challenge in terms of establishing consistent terminology in course design (Ministry of Communications and Digital, 2023). These MC courses should be tailored to meet the demands of learners seeking specific skill sets and knowledge required for reskilling, upskilling, interpersonal skill development, or Industry 4.0 competencies (Desmarchelier & Cary, 2022). The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for a digitalised and flexible lifestyle, leading to evolving personal and professional situations. This unprecedented situation presents an opportune moment to re-evaluate the education system and prepare society for technological advancements.

06 identification of critical success factors

Critical Technological Factors

MCs are digital badges or certifications that demonstrate a learner’s skills or knowledge in a specific area of interest. The increasing popularity of MCs has led to a need for technological infrastructure readiness to support their delivery and management. (Lockley et al., 2016) emphasise the investment in key infrastructure in technology, in addition to curriculum, policy, processes, and training. The technology ecosystem needs to be robust enough to reduce manual work for both issuers and learners, ensure quality and authenticity, and facilitate visibility and compatibility of needs for employers (Markowitz, 2018). Some successful badges are co-created between the potential employer and the university (Leaser & Gallagher, 2017), thus ensuring the quality for the possible future employer from the beginning.

Recent studies have also focused on emerging technologies that could enhance the technological competency of MC design and delivery. In addition, due to the wide array of terms and definitions presently being used for MCs, an up-to-date taxonomy is needed. Blockchain hosting of credentials, controlled by the students, is another technology that needs more research (McGreal et al., 2022).

MCs have gained popularity in recent years as a way for individuals to acquire specific skills and knowledge that employers recognise. These issues include data privacy, credential fraud, platform reliability, and cybersecurity. For example, (Infante-Moro et al., 2020) emphasise the importance of data privacy in the design and delivery of MCs. They suggest that micro-credentialing platforms should use secure data management practices and provide learners with control over their personal information.

Critical Organisational Factors

The organisational factor within HEPs plays a pivotal role in shaping collective beliefs and attitudes toward MCs. The perception of educators and their willingness to embrace these credentials is a fundamental aspect of course success (Woods & Woods, 2021). Establishing a collaborative environment and fostering networking among HEPs during the development of MCs is essential to ensure mutual support. This necessitates that every stakeholder within HEPs comprehends their roles and actively contributes to driving a transformative shift in learning (Kohl, 2019).

In addition, the management of HEPs is the guideline for the implementation process for MC. Management support is crucial to ensure effective leadership to provide supportive strategies such as financial commitment, policy implementation and investment (Howard & Babb, 2022). Apart from the supportive management team, strategic alignment with MC development is important. Therefore, the management team needs to have a continuous investment in MC practices and procedures (Rossiter & Tynan, 2019). For instance, having a monthly meeting to check the strategies implemented to ensure the progress is on track.

Critical People Factors

Learners’ motivation is a key element for the success of MCs, as they proved to be more engaged and more likely to complete their course and apply the skills learned (Kizilcec et al., 2013). The support and guidance provided to learners also play an essential role in the success of MCs (Green & Liem, 2019). For example, learners who received feedback and personalised coaching were more likely to complete their courses. Besides, learners who receive support from instructors are more likely to apply the skills in their work. The recognition and validation of MCs by HEPs and other stakeholders can enhance the credibility and reputation of the courses. In short, MCs are claimed to be the factors to affect learners’ job aspirations.

07 higher education providers framework for micro-credential readiness

Based on the comprehensive evaluation conducted, a framework has been identified and proposed to assess the readiness of HEPs in implementing MCs, taking into consideration the technological, organisational, and people-related factors.

As discussed in previous sections, the significance of MCs in the educational landscape has been established (Table 1). This framework (Figure. 2) aims to identify and understand the impact of each factor on the successful implementation of MCs within HEPs. By considering the technological advancements, organisational strategies, and the involvement of various stakeholders, the framework provides a comprehensive and holistic approach to assess the readiness of HEPs and guide them in effectively implementing MCs.
Asset 2 (2128x1490)
Figure 2: HEPs Framework for MC Readiness
Table 1@3x
Table 1: Summary of Factors by Literature Support

Hypothesis Development

A comprehensive set of hypotheses has been put forward for the purpose of testing and evaluating the readiness of HEPs to successfully implement MCs. These hypotheses are designed to assess various aspects and factors that contribute to the capability of HEPs to adopt and integrate MCs into their existing educational systems. Through rigorous examination and analysis, these hypotheses aim to provide insights into the level of preparedness and potential challenges that HEPs may face when embarking on the implementation of MCs. By systematically testing these hypotheses, valuable information can be gathered to inform decision-making processes and ensure the effective implementation of MCs within the higher education landscape. The hypotheses’ relationship between factors and the description of each element have been concluded in Figure 3 and Table 2.
Asset 3
Figure 3: Hypothesis Development for Testing and Evaluating the Readiness of HEPs
Table 2@3x
Table 2: Description of Each Hypothesis

08 methodology

introduction

Acceptance and adoption of MCs amongst HEPs remains relatively low compared to other types of programmes offered. To gather data on the acceptance and adoption of MCs in Malaysia, a descriptive survey research approach will be utilised. This survey will help identify the challenges faced by Malaysian HEPs in delivering high-quality MC content (El-Farra et al., 2022). Additionally, the descriptive research will provide a comprehensive analysis and description of the current status of MCs by HEPs in Malaysia.

To gain deeper insights into the research questions and explore the main challenges surrounding MCs and their importance amongst Malaysian HEPs, an exploratory research method will be employed. Exploratory research is particularly useful when investigating a new topic with limited existing research (Swedberg, 2020). The theoretical framework developed with the support of exploratory research will explain the challenges encountered by institutions in providing MCs to learners. The combination of these two (2) research methods will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implementation status of MCs in Malaysia (Figure. 4 & Figure 4.1).
Asset 4
FIgure 4: Research Process
A cross-sectional study was designed to study and investigate the research objectives at a point in time. A mixed-method approach was designed to integrate quantitative and qualitative data within a single study. The mixed-method study is particularly advantageous in collecting rich and comprehensive data. For example, perception of the MC often integrates quantitative data (scores determining prevalence) with qualitative data by sharing of emotions and expression. To obtain quantitative data, a survey questionnaire is adopted in this present study, supported by the qualitative study through interviews within focus groups. The main reason behind integrating a mixed-method approach in this study is to allow researchers to explore different perspectives and uncover relationships related to the research questions (Shorten & Smith, 2017). The quantitative data from this study helps in analysing data regarding the demands of MC in multimedia and communication fields. In addition, the qualitative study provides opportunities for participants to reflect and share feelings and experiences MC in multimedia and communication fields. Through this method, qualitative study can help to explain quantitative data with enriched evidence and enable research questions to be answered more deeply (Shorten & Smith, 2017).
Asset 5 (1744x592)
Figure 4.1: Project Timeline

Target Respondents

A priori G* power analysis (Lakens & Caldwell, 2021) was used to generate the minimum sample size required to detect medium effect size, with 0.80 desired statistical power level. Given the structural complexity of the model, the minimum sample size required to detect the effect was 150. 200 participants were targeted for this study, assuming less than 30 per cent of incomplete or missing data may be excluded from the study. The target groups are those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria below:

•  HEPs (Management and Educator).
•  Industry relevant to communications and multimedia.
•  Individuals aged 18-60 years old.
•  Able to provide consent (verbal/written) to participate.
•  Understand Bahasa Malaysia or English

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The analysis followed a per-protocol approach, which means that only participants with valid baseline data and those who have completed at least one (1) of the endpoint assessments according to their assigned groups will be included in the analysis.

09 findings and analysis

Descriptive Analysis

Types of Higher Education Providers Targeted

558 respondents participated in the online survey to study the readiness of HEPs to implement MCs from the perspectives of Technological, Organisational, and People Readiness. The HEPs participating comprised public universities, private universities, vocational colleges, polytechnics, private colleges, community colleges and skills institutes. The breakdown of the institutions is summarised in the bar chart below (Figure 5). Based on the bar chart, the highest number of respondents were from public universities (25.9 per cent), private universities (19.18 per cent), and vocational colleges (17.03 per cent).
Asset 6 (1414x1016)
Figure 5: Types of HEPs which Participated in the Survey (%)

Types of Platforms

The bar chart below (Figure 6) shows the online learning platforms (OLPs) which the HEPs preferred or intended to use when implementing MCs. Based on the bar chart, most of the institutions indicated a preference and intention to use Google Classroom (22.65 per cent) as the platform for implementing MCs followed by Moodle (18.93 per cent), Udemy (15.68 per cent), and Coursera (13.82 per cent) as second, third and fourth choices respectively. In order of preference the bar chart below also clearly shows that Blackboard (4.3 per cent) is the least preferred online platform for MC implementations.
Asset 7 (1594x866)
Figure 6: HEPs OLPs preference and intention to use for deploying MCs (%)

Current Implementation of Micro-Credentials amongst Higher Education Providers in Malaysia

In this study, the status of MC adoption rate in Malaysia has been investigated where the institutions were asked to describe the institutional MC implementation or availability status via survey. The current status of the MCs implementation stage across institutions is shown in the table below. The respondents were asked to rate between 0 to 4, and the representation of the rating is shown below (Figure 7). At present, 6.99 per cent of the HEPs do not intend to implement MC, while 15.41 per cent of the HEPs are going to implement MC programmes in the next 12 months. On the other hand, 26.88 per cent of HEPs are in the preliminary stage, 14.70 per cent are in the intermediate stage, and 36.02 per cent are in the maturity stage.
Asset 8 (1082x1292) Table 3@3x
Figure 7: Total Institutuions in Each Stage (%)

Current Micro-Credential Implementation Status by HEP Segment

Based on the findings of MC implementation status (Figure 8), 36.04 per cent of the skills institutes are planning to implement MCs in the next 12 months. In the case of vocational colleges, they are mostly in the in the maturity stage where there are 32.34 per cent of them have all programmes offered in MCs form. In contrast, there are only 10.26 per cent of the vocational colleges have no intent to implement MCs (Level 0) for the time being. With regards to community colleges 12 per cent are at the preliminary stage of implementation (Level 2). 17.91 per cent of the polytechnics are at the mature status level for MC programme implementation (Level 4). In the case of private colleges, 12.67 per cent of them are in the preliminary stage (Level 2), while only 4.48 per cent are in the maturity stage (Level 4). Furthermore, nearly a third of all private universities (32.67 per cent) are in the preliminary stage (Level 2), while for public universities, 27.86 per cent of them are in the maturity stage (Level 4).
Asset 9 (2126x1291) Table 4@3x
Figure 8: MC Implementation Status by HEPs Segment (%)

Disciplines of Micro-Credentials Offered

The disciplines in which the institutions prefer to offer MC were investigated through the survey. Figure 9 shows the disciplines that the HEPs wish to offer as MCs. Based on the results obtained, most of the institutions preferred to offer MCs in medical sciences followed by engineering, Mathematics and Statistics. Based on Hernandez et al. (2014), professional practice in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is expected to build students’ conceptual knowledge and understanding of engineering and technology. This indicates that STEM subjects may be suitable for MC implementation, as they require practical skills and knowledge. Hence, most institutions preferred to offer MCs related to STEM.
Asset 10 (1290x835)
FIgure 9: Number of HEPs in Discipline Offered

Communications and Multimedia Micro-Credentials Courses Offered by Higher Education Providers

The institutions were asked about the Multimedia and Communication MCs courses that are or will be offered in their institutions. Nine choices of Communication and Multimedia related courses, namely Data Communication and Networking, Multimedia Related Courses, Information Technology and Multimedia, 4G and 5G Standards, Technologies and Architecture, Modulation, Channel Equalisation and Diversity Techniques for Mobile Radio Communication Systems, Data Communications and Networking, Data & Network Security, Advanced Signal Processing, and Multimedia-Based Instructional Design were provided in the survey. Figure 10 shows the number of votes received for each of the course choices. Based on the results obtained, most of the institutions mentioned that their institutions are or will be offering Information Technology and Multimedia followed by Modulation, Channel Equalisation and Diversity Techniques for Mobile Radio Communication Systems, 4G and 5G Standards, and Technologies and Architecture courses.
Asset 11 (1290x845) Table 6@3x
Figure 10: C&M MC Courses by Number of HEPs

Reasons for Higher Education Providers to Implement Micro-Credential

To understand the role of MCs from the higher education providers’ perspective, the reasons for the institutions to implement these courses were investigated. Figure 11 shows the data obtained for this study. Most of the HEPs offered MCs as a sample of diploma / undergraduate programmes. On the other hand, institutions offered MCs since there are market needs from industries which prefer MCs to conventional degree certificates. This is because MCs are seen as a way of meeting upskilling requirements for individuals looking to advance their careers and to provide a skilled workforce for rapidly changing industries (Desmarchelier & Cary, 2022; Oliver, 2019). Some of the offerings in terms of MCs are Modulation, Channel Equalisation and Diversity Techniques for Mobile Radio Communication Systems and Information Technology and Multimedia (multimedia programming).
Asset 12 (1414x843) Table 7@3x
Figure 11: Reasons for HEPs to Implement MC Programmes

Construction Validity and Reliability Test

Initially, this study proposed a set of 12 factors that were expected to impact the implementation of MCs. However, it was found that six (6) of these factors had a Cronbach’s Alpha value lower than 0.7, indicating a weak interrelatedness among the items (Ekolu & Quainoo, 2019). This implies that the questionnaire used in the study did not include enough questions, and the items with low alpha should be eliminated due to their poor correlation (Tavakol & Dennick, 2011). Furthermore, the factors with poor alpha values also resulted in insignificant outcomes. Consequently, a step-by-step approach was taken to remove the items with weak correlation one by one, as depicted in Figure 12, until all remaining items achieved a Cronbach’s Alpha value higher than 0.7.
Extra 1@3x
Figure 12: The Analysis Process of The Research
Outer loading is important for the relationship between construct and observable items. The accepted value for outer loadings should be 0.4 and above, values of 0.7 are good (Hair Jr. et al., 2021). As Table 2 shows, all items are higher than 0.4, and a majority of them are greater than 0.7. Besides, the construct validity such as composite reliability (CR) and Cronbach’s alpha are used to measure whether the collected items are measuring the same characteristic consistently (Barbera et al., 2020; Schrepp, 2020). One (1) way to determine the construct validity is to have CR that is larger than 0.7, it is the same as Cronbach’s alpha. As Table 3 shows, both composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha are all greater than 0.7. In other words, this is a good sign of variance for a construct held towards the measurement error. While Average Variance Extracted (AVE) is a measure of the variance captured by a construct in a relationship due to the measurement error. The accepted value for AVE is any value higher than 0.5, while any value less than 0.5 with CR higher than 0.6, the convergent validity for a construct is still sufficient (Huang et al., 2013; Lam, 2012). As Table 7 shows, the values of CR are all higher than 0.6, and the AVE with 0.4 are accepted. This indicated that the construct validity and reliability are both satisfactory.
Table 8@3x
Table 3: Construct Validity and Reliability

Discriminant Validity Analysis

The Discriminant validity test is to determine whether the construct is truly distinct from each other by empirical standards. According to Henseler et al. (2015), the HTMT value should be smaller than 1 to indicate that the true correlation of the constructs is different from one and another. Another way to access discriminant validity is to examine the value of the Fornell-Larcker criterion, in which the accepted value should be higher than the other correlation (Franke & Sarstedt, 2019). As Table 4 shows, all the HTMT values are smaller than 1, indicating a construct is different from the others. Table 5 indicates the value of the Fornell-Larcker criterion is all larger than other correlations. To this extent, it can be concluded the results proved the existence of discriminant validity in this study.
Table 9@3x
Table 4: Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)
Table 10@3x
Table 5: Fornell-Larcker Criterion

Multicollinearity Analysis

Multicollinearity is present where there is a correlation between multiple independent variables which can impact the regression results (Gujarati, 2011). Besides, the importance of multicollinearity analysis is to ensure that the framework can be run correctly (Shrestha, 2020). Checking on the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) is one (1) of the measurements for multicollinearity. Therefore, any value greater than 5 refers to the existence of a multicollinearity issue. MS4 and Out6 were removed due to the higher VIF, Table 6 shows, that the VIF value for all items is smaller than 5 which means there are no multicollinearity issues in this study.
Table 11@3x
Table 6: Multicollinearity Analysis

Hypothesis Testing

The hypothesis framework and each relationship are shown in the figure below (Figure 13). It is believed that the Infrastructure Readiness and Deliverables Competency under Technological Factors have an impact for the HEPs to adopt MCs. Secondly, as mentioned above, the Organisational Factors, including Management Support and Quality Assurance are significant for HEPs to prepare for MC adoption. Lastly, the People Factors such as Competency Skillset and Learner Centricity are suggested to have a positive effect on the HEPs to adopt MCs.
Asset 14 (2336x1339)
Figure 13: Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is used to determine the relationship between each variable for a random sample, with a two-tailed 95 per cent confidence level. The hypothesis test enables the evaluation of the strength of the various hypotheses before implementing the framework (Emmert-Streib & Dehmer, 2019). As shown in Table 7, the hypotheses were tested, and some of the factors are insignificant. Therefore, there are only 4 hypotheses which are significant (i.e. Infrastructure Readiness (H1), Organisational Culture (H4), Customer Centricity (H8), and Quality Assurance (H6).
Table 12@3x
Table 7: Hypothesis Testing

Discussion from Higher Education Providers’ Perspective

H1 has pointed out the significant relationship between infrastructure readiness and the adoption of MCs. This is the most significant factor for HEPs to implement MCs. HEPs should allocate enough funds to acquire appropriate technology infrastructure to provide the best online learning experience for learners (Che Ahmat et al., 2021; Fischer et al., 2022). For instance, the internet connectivity of the online platforms is fundamental for online learning. Furthermore, collaborations with third parties to provide subscriptions would be beneficial in handling troubleshooting when users utilise the OLPs used in delivering MCs (McGreal et al., 2022). For example, HEPs could collaborate with providers of leading OLPs such as Moodle, Google Classroom and Open Learning to provide the best and smoothest learning experience for learners. Besides, H2 shows a positive relationship between deliverables competency and perceived outcome. This requires the HEPs to implement a supportive and computing online learning environment to deliver knowledge and skills to the learners (Mugayitoglu et al., 2021). An example of a supportive learning environment could employ the use of interactive video recordings and the inclusion of built-in exercises to aid the learning of difficult topics. Furthermore, convenient, and organised platforms are important in delivering competencies for learners (Kumar et al., 2022). For example, the HEPs need to ensure their online learning platforms are smooth and supportive to ensure the maximum effectiveness of the online learning experiences.

In relation to critical organisational factors, H5 shows that management support is significant for MC implementation. Top-level management support in technical capabilities and funding for support systems is critical for MC implementation (Mathur et al., 2018). For example, the leadership perception to support MC implementation is important and needs to be communicated across the HEPs. In addition, the HEPs’ management should put in more effort including admission, recruitment, professional educators training and many more to ensure the quality of MC provided (Ahsan et al., 2023). For instance, the financial support from top management for MCs is critical. H9 refers to the positive relationship between quality assurance and MC implementation. The quality assurance of MCs is critical when it comes to the recognition of the new education forms. In other words, this means the HEPs should establish a recognised and standardised value for the MCs to improve the MCs status (Fisher & Leder, 2022; Resei et al., 2019). For example, the recognition of learning assessment across HEPs and industries needs to be communicated and to agree on a standard examination to recognise the digital badge earned. In addition, HEPs should improve the teaching quality, to further analyse the operation of MCs internationally. Besides, HEPs should also implement quality assurance systems for online education including sharing mechanisms, evaluation systems and operation models to ensure the learning experience provided (Brown et al., 2021). To this extent, learners can choose high-quality MCs to maximise their learning experience.

As the results show, H10 indicates the greater the competency skillset, the larger the readiness for HEPs to adopt MCs. This is because the HEPs should have higher skills to educate learners successfully. For example, the usage of blockchain technology by HEP educators can provide better guidance for learners during online learning (Alsobhi et al., 2023). In addition, the professional tools set usage of educators can minimise the learners’ training time and cost to achieve effective and efficient learning outcomes (Wheelahan & Moodie, 2021). H11 shows that learner centricity has a positive impact on MC implementation. This is because the HEPs need to provide learning options comprising online and face-to-face sessions to meet learners’ needs. Many of the HEPs have focused on implementing online learning during COVID-19 and forced the students to remain online. Therefore, the ownership of choosing the option between online and face-to-face can generate a better MC result that led to effective learning outcomes (El-Farra et al., 2022; Rof et al., 2023). In addition, the communication between educators and learners can establish a trust-based relationship that can smoothen the learning experience (Ramlall & Cross, 2021). For example, with support from educators, learners can achieve professional standards by having academic freedom such as learning engagement.

10 summary & implications

Policy Implications for Micro-credential Adoption

Findings from the study have pointed out the importance of MCs and the challenges faced by HEPs during the implementation process. As such, it becomes critical that the development and implementation of MCs at the HEP level be monitored and quality assured (Tham & Chong, 2023). There have also been calls for more centralised and standardised management of MCs to ensure the equivalency and recognition of MCs throughout HEPs in Malaysia (Sabtu & Ismail, 2022).

On this note, the Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA), the education accreditation body and agency tasked with the responsibility of ensuring HEPs’ quality assurance, has continuously been a strong facilitator and supporter of flexible education in Malaysia. One such initiative in support of flexible education was the development of the Guidelines to Good Practices: MCs (GGP) in 20201. The GGP was developed with the intention to serve as a reference to the HEPs in the development of MCbased programmes or courses. The GGP aimed to (1) support the implementation of flexible learning by providing references to the stakeholders on the introduction of MCs; (2) to facilitate and empower all types of MCs whether it is used as supplementary or substituting contents; and (3) to provide a policy on breaking down content for recognition of stand-alone awards and credit transfer purposes.

Higher Education Providers Readiness

In conclusion, while the popularity of MCs amongst the general Malaysian population is still relatively low owing to poor marketing and awareness levels, the degree of readiness amongst Malaysian HEPs Indicates a favourable upward trend with more recognising the potential of MCs in meeting the evolving needs of learners and the job market both domestically and internationally. This is especially seen in rapidly evolving technological fields such as healthcare, C&M, and engineering.

In conclusion, while the popularity of MCs in the general Malaysian population is still relatively low owing to poor marketing and awareness levels, the degree of readiness amongst Malaysian HEPs is definitely indicating an upward trend with more and more recognising the potential of MCs in meeting the evolving needs of learners and the job market both domestically and internationally. This is especially seen in rapidly evolving technological fields such as healthcare, communications & multimedia and engineering.

11 recommendations

Government facilitation and policy

The current study proposes several recommendations to enhance the recognition and value of MC programmes in the field of communications and multimedia. Firstly, it is recommended that government agencies and universities establish a centralised system for recognising and accrediting MC programmes. This would create a transparent ecosystem where industry players and service providers can ensure the widespread acceptance and value of these programmes for learners. Efforts should be made to develop a framework that guarantees the quality and rigour of MCs, ensuring their recognition by employers, educational institutions, and other relevant stakeholders. Involving industry players in the development of programme content can ensure that the programmes align with the demands of the global market, thereby enhancing the reputation and recognition of MC programmes.

Additionally, the government could, through its various agencies, implement policies which facilitate and promote the take-up of MCs. For instance, this could be done by enabling flexible learning pathways through the implementation of “Training Leave”. Currently, learners often have to take personal leave to attend different MC programmes. However, MCs offer the advantage of flexible learning, allowing individuals to acquire skills and credentials at their own pace and convenience. By leveraging online platforms and digital technologies, accessible and personalised learning experiences can be provided. Therefore, by introducing policies that allow employees to utilise “Training Leave” for upskilling purposes, both employers and employees can benefit. This approach would enhance the competitiveness and competency of Malaysia’s workforce in the globalised market.

Overall, these recommendations aim to establish a recognised and valued ecosystem for MCs in Communication and Multimedia, promote flexible learning pathways, and empower employees to enhance their skills and competencies in alignment with the demands of the modern job market.

The Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) plays a pivotal role in the implementation of MCs within HEPs. Firstly, MQA should take on the responsibility of monitoring and ensuring quality assurance for the development of MCs at the HEPs’ level. This would involve rigorous assessment and evaluation to maintain high standards in MC programmes. Secondly, MQA can contribute significantly to the promotion of flexible education in Malaysia by actively supporting the integration of MCs into the educational landscape. Additionally, MQA should take the lead in establishing a clear and comprehensive definition of MCs while outlining key principles for their development and delivery, ensuring consistency and clarity across the board. Lastly, MQA could mandate HEPs to register their MC programmes, thereby embedding quality assurance measures into the design and delivery of these credentials, ultimately enhancing the value and credibility of MCs within the Malaysian education system.

Collaborative Approach in Ensuring Value and Alignment

HEPs play a crucial role in the successful integration of MC programmes in Malaysia. To begin with, there is a pressing need for HEPs to enhance the promotion of MC programmes, as awareness and marketing efforts have been inadequate thus far. Moreover, fostering collaborative relationships between HEPs, industry experts, and employers is imperative to bridge the significant gap between academia and the dynamic job market. HEPs should allocate sufficient financial resources and invest in digital technologies to facilitate MC learning effectively. Equally important is the continuous training and development of educators to equip them with the skills necessary to design and deliver interactive, engaging, and effective MC-based lessons, ensuring that learners derive maximum benefit from these innovative programmes.

Moving forward for the future direction for MCs in Malaysia involves a multi-stage approach. To propel the implementation of MC programmes effectively, it is imperative to establish a harmonised integration between conventional degree programmes and MC offerings, creating diverse and flexible learning pathways. Additionally, the focus should be on enhancing industry recognition and credibility and aligning MC programmes, employers’ needs, and expectations. Promoting lifelong learning within the workplace is essential to facilitate continuous professional and career development, making MC an integral part of this journey. Furthermore, leveraging technological advancements for secure and efficient MC delivery is crucial.

In the development of new MC programmes, collaboration with industry stakeholders through group discussions is vital to identify the specific skills and knowledge demanded by the job market. Standardising syllabi ensures transparency and consistency across MC offerings. Exploring options to cover MC learning fees under the Human Resources Development Cooperation (HRDC) can boost acceptance and motivation among learners, making MCs a more accessible and appealing choice for professional development. These recommendations and strategies pave the way for a promising future for MCs in Malaysia’s educational landscape.

12 acknowledgement

This research project is jointly funded by Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Digital Society Research Grant Project Code: MCMC(RED)700-8/2/11/JLD.4(15) and UCSI University REIG Grant Project Code REIG-ICSDI-2022/070

13 references

Ahsan, K., Akbar, S., Kam, B., & Abdulrahman, M. D. A. (2023). Implementation of micro-credentials in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-11739-Z/TABLES/3
Alsobhi, H. A., Alakhtar, R. A., Ubaid, A., Hussain, O. K., & Hussain, F. K. (2023). Blockchain-based micro credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 265, 110238. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2022.110238
Barbera, J., Naibert, N., Komperda, R., & Pentecost, T. C. (2020). Clarity on Cronbach’s Alpha Use. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 257258. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.0C00183
Bideau, Y.-M., & Kearns, T. (2022). A European Approach to Micro credentials for Lifelong Learning and Employability. Journal of European CME, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2022.2147288
Brown, M., Nic, M., Mhichil, G., Beirne, E., & Lochlainn, C. Mac. (2021). The Global Micro-Credential Landscape: Charting a New Credential Ecology for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 228–254.
Che Ahmat, N. H., Bashir, M. A. A., Razali, A. R., & Kasolang, S. (2021). Micro Credentials in Higher Education Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V17I3.14505
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID ... and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
Desmarchelier, R., & Cary, L. J. (2022). Toward just and equitable micro-credentials: an Australian perspective. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00332-Y/METRICS
Duklas, J. (2020). Micro Credentials: Trends in Credit Transfer and Credentialing. British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer.
Ekolu, S. O., & Quainoo, H. (2019). Reliability of assessments in engineering education using Cronbach’s alpha, KR and spliy-half methods. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 24–29.
El-Farra, S. A., Mohaidat, J. M., Aldajah, S. H., & Alshamsi, A. M. (2022). Alternative Digital Credentials—UAE’s First Adopters’ Quality Assurance Model and Case Study. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 104, 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_25/COVER
Emmert-Streib, F., & Dehmer, M. (2019). Understanding Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical Inference. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 2019, Vol. 1, Pages 945-961, 1(3), 945–961. https://doi.org/10.3390/MAKE1030054
Fischer, T., Oppl, S., & Stabauer, M. (2022). Micro-Credential Development: Tools, Methods and Concepts Supporting the European Approach. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings.
Fisher, R. M., & Leder, H. (2022). An assessment of micro-credentials in New Zealand vocational education. International Journal of Training Research, 20(3), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.2018018
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2017-0515/FULL/PDF
Ghasia, M., Machumu, H., & Smet, E. (2019). Micro-credentials in higher education institutions: An exploratory study of its place in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 15(1).
Green, J., & Liem, G. A. D. (2019). Designing Microcredentials for Competency-Based Education: Insights From the Field. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 4(1), 1–11. Gujarati, D. (2011). Econometrics by Example. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS SEM) Using R. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-014-0403-8/FIGURES/8
Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez K. E., Chen, T. W., & de Miranda, M. A. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2013 24:1, 24(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-013-9241-0
Howard, E., & Babb, D. (2022). FLOC, Facilitating Learning Online Certification Workshop Part of the Micro-Credential series for online teaching certification. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 25(3).
Huang, C.-C., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, T. W., & Wang, P.-A. (2013). An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Using the Moodle Platform. International Journal of Information Education Technology, 3(2).
Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Gallardo-Perez, J. (2020). The Employment Possibilities of the Internet of Things in the Hotel Sector and its Training Needs. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Kiiskila, P., Hanafy, A., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2022). Features of Micro-Credential Platforms in Higher Education A Set of Studies on Technostress and Coping View project ECIU (European Consortium of Innovative Universities) View project Features of Micro-Credential Platforms in Higher Education. CSEDU, 1, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011030600003182
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Kohl, A. (2019). Establishing A Programme For Teacher Micro Credentials To Support Individual Professional Learning. Dissertations.
Koronios, K., Kriemadis, A., Dimitropoulos, P., & Papadopoulos, A. (2019). A values framework for measuring the influence of ethics and motivation regarding the performance of employees. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 2241–2312.
Kumar, J. A., Richard, R. J., Osman, S., & Lowrence, K. (2022). Micro credentials in leveraging emergency remote teaching: the relationship between novice users’ insights and identity in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00323-Z
Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-Based Power Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs. Association for Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–14.
Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2011.10.026
Leaser, D., & Gallagher, S. (2017). Convergence of Credentials: How Corporations and Colleges Are Teaming to Skill Up the Technology Workforce. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2017/12/convergence-ofcredentials
Lemoine, P. A., & Richardson, M. D. (2015). Micro-Credentials, Nano Degrees, and Digital Badges: New Credentials for Global Higher Education. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing, 5(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEM.2015010104
Lim, C. L., Nair, P. K., Keppell, M. J., Hassan, N., & Ayub, E. (2018). Developing a framework for the university-wide implementation of micro-credentials and digital badges: A case study from a Malaysian private university. 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communications, ICCC 2018, 1715–1719. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPCOMM.2018.8780706
Lockley, A., Derryberry, A., & West, D. (2016). Drivers, affordances and challenges of digital badges. Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials: Demonstrating and Recognizing Knowledge and Competencies, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_4/COVER
Mathur, A., Wood, M. E., & Cano, A. (2018). Mastery of Transferrable Skills by Doctoral Scholars: Visualization using Digital Micro credentialing. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(5), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1510261
McGill, T., Ross, J., & Schauder, D. (2020). Factors that influence learners’ decisions to adopt and complete micro-credentials. Distance Education, 41(2), 239–255.
McGreal, R., Mackintosh, W., Cox, G., & Olcott, D. (2022). Bridging the Gap: Micro-credentials for Development UNESCO Chairs Policy Brief Form - Under the III World Higher Education Conference (WHEC 2021) Type: Collective X. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 23(3), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V23I3.6696
McGreal, R., & Olcott, D. (2022). A strategic reset: micro-credentials for higher education leaders. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40561-022-00190-1/TABLES/1
MCMC. (2022, August). About Us. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. https://www.mcmc.gov.my/en/about-us/vision-mission
Ministry of Communication and Digital. (2023, May 13). Communication Ministry Will Help Accelerate Innovations Like Micro-Credentials, Says Zahidi. Ministry of Communication and Digital. https://www.kkd.gov.my/en/public/news/22086-communication-ministry-will-help-accelerate-innovations-like-micro-credentials-says-zahidi
Mugayitoglu, B., Borowczak, M., & Burrows, A. C. (2021). A University’s Developmental Framework: Creating, Implementing, and Evaluating a K-12 Teacher Cybersecurity Micro-credential Course. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 19(2).
Oliver, B. (Deakin U. (2019). Making micro-credentials work for learners, employers and providers. Deakin University, August, 56. http://dteach.deakin.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/sites/103/2019/08/Makingmicro-credentials-work-Oliver-Deakin-2019-full-report.pdf
Pollard, V., & Vincent, A. (2022). Micro-credentials: A Postdigital Counternarrative. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 843859. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42438022-00311-6/METRICS
Ramlall, S., & Cross, T. (2021). The Shift to Virtual Learning and the Impact on Higher Education. Tackling Online Education: Implications of Responses to COVID-19 in Higher Education Globally. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Nrc-EAAAQBA J&oi=fnd&pg=PA88&dq=learner+centricity+for+micro+credential&ots=SbP2nSBfT1&si g=NBeFEUyCGphzL0Rzx7ucuDAQ624&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Resei, C., Friedl, C., Staubitz, T., & Rohloff, T. (2019). RESULT 1.1c MICRO-CREDENTIALS IN EU AND GLOBAL MICRO-CREDENTIALS IN EU AND GLOBAL. In Corporate Edupreneurship.
Rof, A., Bikfalvi, A., & Marques, P. (2023). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Intelligence in Systems and Business Models. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 549, 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_18/COVER
Rossiter, D., & Tynan, B. (2019). Designing and Implementing Micro Credentials: A Guide for Practitioners. Commonwealth of Learning (COL).
Rottmann, A. K., & Duggan, M. H. (2021). Micro-Credentials in Higher Education. IGI Global, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4360-3.CH011
Rubin, A., & Brown, A. (2019). Unlocking the Future of Learning by Redesigning Educator Learning. 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6
Sabtu, A., & Ismail, S. A. (2022). Using Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) Standards as a “Wake-Up Call” to Information Resource Assessment: An early view. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI9), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.21834/EBPJ.V7ISI9.4287
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2018). The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Information Systems: A Review. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 877, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_9
Schrepp, M. (2020). On the Usage of Cronbach’s Alpha to Measure Reliability of UX Scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 15, 247–258.
Selvaratnam, R., & Sankey, M. (2019). Micro credentialing as a sustainable way forward for universities in Australia: Perceptions of the landscape. ACODE Whitepaper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337884817
Shanahan, B. W., & Organ, J. (2022). Harnessing the Benefits of Micro Credentials for Industry 4.0 and 5.0: Skills Training and Lifelong Learning. IFAC PapersOnLine, 55(39), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2022.12.015
Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(3), 74–75. https://doi.org/10.1136/EB-2017102699
Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1 Swedberg, R. (2020). ExploratoryResearch. In C. Elman, J.Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science - Google Books. Cambridge University Press.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/IJME.4DFB.8DFD
Tham, S. Y., & Chong, P. Y. (2023). Transforming Malaysia’s Higher Education: Policies and Progress. Asian Economic Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/AEPR.12417
West, R. E., & Cheng, Z. (2022). Digital Credential Evolution How Open Microcredentials/ Badges Support Learning in Micro-, Meso-, Macro-levels. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_71-1
Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2021). Analysing micro-credentials in higher education: a Bernsteinian analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887358
Woods, K., & Woods, J. A. (2021). Less Is More: Exploring the Value of Micro-Credentials Within a Graduate Programme. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2021.1966923

up next:

Public and Governmental Sector Adoption of Digital Signature Usage for E-Government Initiatives

by Ts. Dr. Nur Hani Zulkifli Abai, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shamshuritawati Sharif, Dr. Mawarny Md Rejab, Mr. Suwannit Chareen Chit A/L Sop Chit and Assoc. Prof. Ts. Dr. Mohamad Fadli Zolkipli
Read manuscript
download arrow-left arrow-right